PHR vs HCAT

For growth investors, Phreesia, Inc.

(PHR) is the stronger pick with 17. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT). Analysts rate Phreesia, Inc. (PHR) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Phreesia, Inc.

(PHR) delivered a total return of -80. 2%, compared to -96. 9% for Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PHR returned -62. 0% versus HCAT's -96. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Phreesia, Inc.

(PHR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Health Catalyst, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning HCAT is approximately 158% more volatile than PHR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Phreesia, Inc. (PHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 8% for Health Catalyst, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Phreesia, Inc.

(PHR) is pulling ahead at 17. 8% versus 1. 5% for Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phreesia, Inc. grew EPS 59. 4% year-over-year, compared to -121. 7% for Health Catalyst, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PHR leads at 25. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Phreesia, Inc.

(PHR) is the more profitable company, earning -13. 9% net margin versus -57. 2% for Health Catalyst, Inc. — meaning it keeps -13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PHR leads at -13. 8% versus -51. 7% for HCAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PHR leads at 67. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Health Catalyst, Inc.

(HCAT) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 29. 6x for Phreesia, Inc. — 15. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PHR: 181. 8% to $26. 86.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Phreesia, Inc.

(PHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79)). Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PHR: -62. 0%, HCAT: -96. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PHR is a small-cap high-growth stock; HCAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.