REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PINE vs ADC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
PINE vs ADC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $279M | $9.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $65M | $750M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-415K | $220M |
| Gross Margin | -4.1% | 87.6% |
| Operating Margin | 28.0% | 48.0% |
| Forward P/E | 58.8x | 39.0x |
| Total Debt | $394M | $3.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $16M |
PINE vs ADC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 157.5 | +57.5% |
| Agree Realty Corpor… (ADC) | 100 | 121.9 | +21.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PINE vs ADC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +35.5% vs ADC's +3.9%
ADC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta -0.14, yield 4.0%
- Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth -0.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.7%
- 137.5% 10Y total return vs PINE's 37.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.4% FFO/revenue growth vs PINE's 15.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (39.0x vs 58.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs PINE's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (53.5% vs 130.8%) | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs PINE's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.5% vs ADC's +3.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs PINE's -0.1%, ROIC 2.8% vs 2.2% |
PINE vs ADC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PINE vs ADC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADC is the larger business by revenue, generating $750M annually — 11.6x PINE's $65M. ADC is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PINE's -0.6%. On growth, PINE holds the edge at +29.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $65M | $750M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $638M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$415,000 | $220M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$46M | $110M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +87.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.0% | +48.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -71.7% | +14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.6% | +18.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +185.7% | +19.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PINE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PINE's 14.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ADC's 20.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $279M | $9.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $669M | $12.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -88.55x | 43.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 58.83x | 39.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 113.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.58x | 20.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.61x | 12.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | 1.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ADC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ADC delivers a 3.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-0 for PINE. ADC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PINE's 1.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADC scores 5/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.1% | +3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.2% | +2.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +3.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.31x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $390M | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $16M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $394M | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.82x | 2.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PINE five years ago would be worth $14,113 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,046 for ADC. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +35.5% total return vs ADC's +3.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINE at 13.3% vs ADC's 8.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.8% | +7.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.5% | +3.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.6% | +26.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.1% | +30.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.4% | +137.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.3% | +8.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PINE and ADC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADC is the less volatile stock with a -0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PINE's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | -0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.80 | $82.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.10 | $69.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.7% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 43.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 175K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
ADC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PINE as "Buy" and ADC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.2% upside for ADC (target: $84) vs 6.5% for PINE (target: $21). For income investors, ADC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.75 | $83.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $3.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.2% | +0.0% |
ADC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PINE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
PINE vs ADC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PINE or ADC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger pick with 16.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 9% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE). Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (39. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PINE or ADC?
On forward P/E, Agree Realty Corporation is actually cheaper at 39.
0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PINE or ADC?
Over the past 5 years, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
(PINE) delivered a total return of +41. 1%, compared to +30. 5% for Agree Realty Corporation (ADC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADC returned +137. 5% versus PINE's +37. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PINE or ADC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
14β versus Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. 's 0. 33β — meaning PINE is approximately -339% more volatile than ADC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 131% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PINE or ADC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is pulling ahead at 16.
4% versus 15. 9% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agree Realty Corporation grew EPS -0. 6% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ADC leads at 18. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PINE or ADC?
Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the more profitable company, earning 28.
4% net margin versus -4. 4% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADC leads at 47. 4% versus 30. 5% for PINE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADC leads at 87. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PINE or ADC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) trades at 39.
0x forward P/E versus 58. 8x for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — 19. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADC: 9. 2% to $83. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PINE or ADC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 2% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE).
09Is PINE or ADC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
14), 4. 0% yield, +137. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADC: +137. 5%, PINE: +37. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PINE and ADC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ADC pays a dividend while PINE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.