Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
PNR vs XYL vs RXO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Trucking
PNR vs XYL vs RXO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $12.76B | $27.49B | $3.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.20B | $9.09B | $4.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $671M | $973M | $-69M |
| Gross Margin | 40.9% | 38.6% | 17.5% |
| Operating Margin | 20.6% | 13.6% | -0.2% |
| Forward P/E | 14.8x | 20.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.64B | $1.94B | $861M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $102M | $1.48B | $18M |
PNR vs XYL vs RXO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pentair plc (PNR) | 100 | 183.9 | +83.9% |
| Xylem Inc. (XYL) | 100 | 112.9 | +12.9% |
| RXO, Inc. (RXO) | 100 | 110.2 | +10.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PNR vs XYL vs RXO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PNR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 126.9% 10Y total return vs XYL's 204.7%
- Better valuation composite
- 16.0% margin vs RXO's -1.6%
XYL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 16.5%, current ratio 1.63x
- PEG 0.91 vs PNR's 1.13
RXO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 72.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.2%
- 26.2% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3%
- +78.2% vs PNR's -12.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.0% margin vs RXO's -1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs RXO's 2.74, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs PNR's 1.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.2% vs PNR's -12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.9% ROA vs RXO's -2.9%, ROIC 12.1% vs -0.2% |
PNR vs XYL vs RXO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PNR vs XYL vs RXO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XYL is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.1B annually — 2.2x PNR's $4.2B. PNR is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RXO's -1.6%. On growth, XYL holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.2B | $9.1B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $983M | $1.8B | $77M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $671M | $973M | -$69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $716M | $966M | $9M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.9% | +38.6% | +17.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +13.6% | -0.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +10.7% | -1.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +10.6% | +0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +2.7% | -99.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.9% | +14.5% | -16.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PNR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.9x trailing earnings, PNR trades at a 32% valuation discount to XYL's 29.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XYL offers better value at 1.29x vs PNR's 1.52x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.8B | $27.5B | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.3B | $27.9B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.94x | 29.50x | -39.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.75x | 20.91x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.52x | 1.29x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.66x | 15.54x | 42.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.06x | 3.04x | 0.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.38x | 2.40x | 2.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.11x | 30.21x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PNR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PNR delivers a 17.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RXO. XYL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RXO's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs RXO's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.7% | +8.5% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.9% | +5.6% | -2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.1% | +7.6% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.0% | +8.5% | -0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.17x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $463M | $843M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $102M | $1.5B | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $1.9B | $861M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.94x | 49.32x | -3.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PNR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PNR five years ago would be worth $12,298 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,262 for XYL. Over the past 12 months, RXO leads with a +78.2% total return vs PNR's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PNR at 11.8% vs XYL's 3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.6% | -15.3% | +80.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.8% | -3.2% | +78.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.8% | +11.9% | +19.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.0% | +2.6% | +10.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.9% | +204.7% | +10.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.8% | +3.8% | +6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XYL and RXO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XYL is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RXO's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RXO currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs PNR's 69.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 0.92x | 2.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $113.95 | $154.27 | $23.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $77.02 | $114.15 | $10.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.3% | +75.0% | +99.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.3 | 45.4 | 62.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 2.1M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
XYL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PNR as "Hold", XYL as "Hold", RXO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.8% upside for PNR (target: $114) vs -30.9% for RXO (target: $16). For income investors, XYL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.39% vs PNR's 1.26%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $113.56 | $151.57 | $16.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 40 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +1.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 15 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.99 | $1.60 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +0.1% | +0.0% |
PNR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). XYL leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
PNR vs XYL vs RXO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PNR or XYL or RXO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RXO, Inc.
(RXO) is the stronger pick with 26. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). Pentair plc (PNR) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pentair plc (PNR) a "Hold" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PNR or XYL or RXO?
On trailing P/E, Pentair plc (PNR) is the cheapest at 19.
9x versus Xylem Inc. at 29. 5x. On forward P/E, Pentair plc is actually cheaper at 14. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Xylem Inc. wins at 0. 91x versus Pentair plc's 1. 13x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PNR or XYL or RXO?
Over the past 5 years, Pentair plc (PNR) delivered a total return of +23.
0%, compared to +2. 6% for Xylem Inc. (XYL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XYL returned +204. 7% versus RXO's +10. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PNR or XYL or RXO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xylem Inc.
(XYL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus RXO, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning RXO is approximately 196% more volatile than XYL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Xylem Inc. (XYL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 56% for RXO, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PNR or XYL or RXO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RXO, Inc.
(RXO) is pulling ahead at 26. 2% versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RXO, Inc. grew EPS 72. 8% year-over-year, compared to 5. 9% for Pentair plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, XYL leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PNR or XYL or RXO?
Pentair plc (PNR) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
7% net margin versus -1. 7% for RXO, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PNR leads at 20. 5% versus -0. 1% for RXO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PNR leads at 40. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PNR or XYL or RXO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Xylem Inc. (XYL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus Pentair plc's 1. 13x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pentair plc (PNR) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 20. 9x for Xylem Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNR: 43. 8% to $113. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — PNR or XYL or RXO?
In this comparison, XYL (1.
4% yield), PNR (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. RXO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PNR or XYL or RXO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Xylem Inc.
(XYL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 1. 4% yield, +204. 7% 10Y return). RXO, Inc. (RXO) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XYL: +204. 7%, RXO: +10. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PNR and XYL and RXO?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PNR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; XYL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RXO is a small-cap high-growth stock. PNR, XYL pay a dividend while RXO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.