PROF vs AEYE

For growth investors, Profound Medical Corp.

(PROF) is the stronger pick with 58. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 5% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). Profound Medical Corp. (PROF) offers the better valuation at 5. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Profound Medical Corp. (PROF) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) delivered a total return of -63. 7%, compared to -64. 1% for Profound Medical Corp. (PROF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +80. 2% versus PROF's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Profound Medical Corp.

(PROF) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 61β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning AEYE is approximately 42% more volatile than PROF relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Profound Medical Corp.

(PROF) is pulling ahead at 58. 3% versus 14. 5% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Profound Medical Corp. grew EPS 231. 8% year-over-year, compared to 30. 6% for AudioEye, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PROF leads at 34. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Profound Medical Corp.

(PROF) is the more profitable company, earning 262. 9% net margin versus -7. 6% for AudioEye, Inc. — meaning it keeps 262. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEYE leads at -7. 9% versus -256. 3% for PROF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Profound Medical Corp.

(PROF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PROF: -25. 6%, AEYE: +80. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (PROF (Healthcare) and AEYE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PROF is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.