Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
Q vs AVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
Q vs AVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $30.08B | $6.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.33B | $24.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $693M | $214M |
| Gross Margin | 46.1% | 10.5% |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 37.7x | 16.2x |
| Total Debt | $191M | $2.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $166M | $192M |
Quick Verdict: Q vs AVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Q is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.4%, EPS growth 36.7%
- 7.4% revenue growth vs AVT's -6.6%
- 16.0% margin vs AVT's 0.9%
AVT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 1.6%
- 132.4% 10Y total return vs Q's 50.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 57.4%, current ratio 2.43x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.4% revenue growth vs AVT's -6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.2x vs 37.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.0% margin vs AVT's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs Q's 2.65 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.6% vs Q's +50.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs AVT's 1.7%, ROIC 5.7% vs 6.0% |
Q vs AVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Q vs AVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Q leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVT is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.0B annually — 5.8x Q's $4.3B. Q is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AVT's 0.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $25.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $781M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $214M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.1% | +10.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +33.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AVT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.4x trailing earnings, AVT trades at a 32% valuation discount to Q's 43.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AVT's 12.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than Q's 24.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30.1B | $6.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30.1B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.40x | 29.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.67x | 16.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.26x | 12.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.94x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.76x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.93x | 11.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Q leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Q delivers a 6.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $4 for AVT. Q carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVT's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), Q scores 8/9 vs AVT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.6% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $25M | $2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $166M | $192M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $191M | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.02x | 2.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVT five years ago would be worth $19,408 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,083 for Q. Over the past 12 months, AVT leads with a +65.6% total return vs Q's +50.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVT at 27.0% vs Q's 14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +69.1% | +64.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.8% | +65.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +105.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +94.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +132.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +27.0% |
Risk & Volatility
AVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVT is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than Q's 2.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.65x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $151.36 | $84.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $70.50 | $44.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.9% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 76.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates Q as "Buy" and AVT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -1.9% upside for AVT (target: $79) vs -13.0% for Q (target: $125). AVT is the only dividend payer here at 1.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $125.00 | $79.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.6% |
AVT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). Q leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
Q vs AVT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is Q or AVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Qnity Electronics, Inc.
(Q) is the stronger pick with 7. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). Avnet, Inc. (AVT) offers the better valuation at 29. 4x trailing P/E (16. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — Q or AVT?
On trailing P/E, Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) is the cheapest at 29. 4x versus Qnity Electronics, Inc. at 43. 4x. On forward P/E, Avnet, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — Q or AVT?
Over the past 5 years, Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) delivered a total return of +94. 1%, compared to +50. 8% for Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVT returned +132. 4% versus Q's +50. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — Q or AVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus Qnity Electronics, Inc. 's 2. 65β — meaning Q is approximately 109% more volatile than AVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 57% for Avnet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — Q or AVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Qnity Electronics, Inc.
(Q) is pulling ahead at 7. 4% versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qnity Electronics, Inc. grew EPS 36. 7% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Avnet, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — Q or AVT?
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
(Q) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 0% net margin versus 1. 1% for Avnet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: Q leads at 19. 5% versus 2. 8% for AVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — Q leads at 46. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is Q or AVT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) trades at 16. 2x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Qnity Electronics, Inc. — 21. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVT: -1. 9% to $79. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — Q or AVT?
In this comparison, AVT (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. Q does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is Q or AVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27), 1. 6% yield, +132. 4% 10Y return). Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) carries a higher beta of 2. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AVT: +132. 4%, Q: +50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between Q and AVT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
AVT pays a dividend while Q does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.