Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
QLYS vs TENB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
QLYS vs TENB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $3.24B | $2.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $685M | $1.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $201M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 83.1% | 78.2% |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | 2.9% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $97M | $466M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250M | $188M |
QLYS vs TENB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) | 100 | 78.8 | -21.2% |
| Tenable Holdings, I… (TENB) | 100 | 67.7 | -32.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QLYS vs TENB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QLYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.53
- 252.6% 10Y total return vs TENB's -30.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.41x
TENB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.0%, EPS growth 3.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.5%
- 11.0% revenue growth vs QLYS's 10.1%
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 12.3x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.0% revenue growth vs QLYS's 10.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 12.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.4% margin vs TENB's -1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs TENB's 1.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -28.4% vs TENB's -32.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.1% ROA vs TENB's -0.7%, ROIC 47.5% vs 0.2% |
QLYS vs TENB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
QLYS vs TENB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QLYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TENB and QLYS operate at a comparable scale, with $1.0B and $685M in trailing revenue. QLYS is the more profitable business, keeping 29.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TENB's -1.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $685M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $241M | $72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $201M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $290M | $263M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.1% | +78.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.7% | +2.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | -1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +42.4% | +25.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.8% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.1% | +106.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TENB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, QLYS's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TENB's 62.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.70x | -70.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.32x | 10.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.86x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.06x | 62.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.84x | 2.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.90x | 7.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.65x | 9.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QLYS leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QLYS delivers a 37.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-4 for TENB. QLYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TENB's 1.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QLYS scores 6/9 vs TENB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +37.2% | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.1% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +47.5% | +0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +37.8% | +0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 1.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$153M | $278M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $250M | $188M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $97M | $466M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
QLYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QLYS five years ago would be worth $9,250 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,739 for TENB. Over the past 12 months, QLYS leads with a -28.4% total return vs TENB's -32.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QLYS at -7.6% vs TENB's -16.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.7% | -6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.4% | -32.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.2% | -42.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.5% | -42.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +252.6% | -30.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.6% | -16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — QLYS and TENB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TENB's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.53x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $155.47 | $35.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $74.51 | $15.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.4% | +59.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.6 | 59.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 768K | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates QLYS as "Hold" and TENB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.8% upside for QLYS (target: $134) vs 32.0% for TENB (target: $28).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $134.30 | $27.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.7% | +10.2% |
QLYS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TENB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
QLYS vs TENB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QLYS or TENB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tenable Holdings, Inc.
(TENB) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 1% for Qualys, Inc. (QLYS). Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (12. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QLYS or TENB?
On forward P/E, Tenable Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 10. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QLYS or TENB?
Over the past 5 years, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) delivered a total return of -7. 5%, compared to -42. 6% for Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QLYS returned +252. 6% versus TENB's -30. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QLYS or TENB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Tenable Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning TENB is approximately 112% more volatile than QLYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 143% for Tenable Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — QLYS or TENB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tenable Holdings, Inc.
(TENB) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus 10. 1% for Qualys, Inc. (QLYS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qualys, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to 3. 2% for Tenable Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TENB leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QLYS or TENB?
Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -3. 6% for Tenable Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QLYS leads at 33. 2% versus 0. 1% for TENB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QLYS leads at 82. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QLYS or TENB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tenable Holdings, Inc.
(TENB) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for Qualys, Inc. — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QLYS: 47. 8% to $134. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — QLYS or TENB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is QLYS or TENB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), +252. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (QLYS: +252. 6%, TENB: -30. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QLYS and TENB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: QLYS is a small-cap deep-value stock; TENB is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.