Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
QVCGB vs VSCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
QVCGB vs VSCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $4M | $4.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.23B | $6.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2.44B | $171M |
| Gross Margin | 34.3% | 36.7% |
| Operating Margin | -22.7% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $6.45B | $2.70B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.97B | $227M |
QVCGB vs VSCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| QVC Group Inc. (QVCGB) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Victoria's Secret &… (VSCO) | 100 | 127.5 | +27.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QVCGB vs VSCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QVCGB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 86.9% 10Y total return vs VSCO's 21.3%
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 18.8x)
- 24.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
VSCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.23
- Rev growth 0.8%, EPS growth 46.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.23, current ratio 1.05x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.8% revenue growth vs QVCGB's -8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 18.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.7% margin vs QVCGB's -26.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.23 vs QVCGB's 2.91 | |
| Dividends | 24.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +171.2% vs QVCGB's -99.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.6% ROA vs QVCGB's -31.6%, ROIC 7.7% vs 10.2% |
QVCGB vs VSCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VSCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QVCGB and VSCO operate at a comparable scale, with $9.2B and $6.4B in trailing revenue. VSCO is the more profitable business, keeping 2.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QVCGB's -26.4%. On growth, VSCO holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.2B | $6.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.7B | $561M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2.4B | $171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $26M | $309M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.3% | +36.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.7% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.4% | +2.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.1% | +9.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.4% | +35.2% |
Valuation Metrics
QVCGB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, QVCGB's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VSCO's 11.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.5B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 25.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 18.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.93x | 11.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 0.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.16x | 16.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VSCO leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VSCO scores 7/9 vs QVCGB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +24.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.6% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.5% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.0B | $227M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.4B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.92x | 4.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VSCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VSCO five years ago would be worth $12,132 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,527 for QVCGB. Over the past 12 months, VSCO leads with a +171.2% total return vs QVCGB's -99.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VSCO at 24.4% vs QVCGB's -83.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -98.0% | -3.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.8% | +171.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +92.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.7% | +21.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.9% | +21.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -83.5% | +24.4% |
Risk & Volatility
VSCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VSCO is the less volatile stock with a 2.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QVCGB's 2.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VSCO currently trades 77.1% from its 52-week high vs QVCGB's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.91x | 2.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $454.50 | $66.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.51 | $17.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +77.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.4 | 48.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 177 | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
QVCGB is the only dividend payer here at 24.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $55.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +24.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
VSCO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QVCGB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
QVCGB vs VSCO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QVCGB or VSCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Victoria's Secret & Co.
(VSCO) is the stronger pick with 0. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for QVC Group Inc. (QVCGB). Victoria's Secret & Co. (VSCO) offers the better valuation at 25. 3x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Victoria's Secret & Co. (VSCO) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QVCGB or VSCO?
On forward P/E, QVC Group Inc.
is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QVCGB or VSCO?
Over the past 5 years, Victoria's Secret & Co.
(VSCO) delivered a total return of +21. 3%, compared to -44. 7% for QVC Group Inc. (QVCGB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QVCGB returned +86. 9% versus VSCO's +21. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QVCGB or VSCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Victoria's Secret & Co.
(VSCO) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 23β versus QVC Group Inc. 's 2. 91β — meaning QVCGB is approximately 31% more volatile than VSCO relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — QVCGB or VSCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Victoria's Secret & Co.
(VSCO) is pulling ahead at 0. 8% versus -8. 0% for QVC Group Inc. (QVCGB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Victoria's Secret & Co. grew EPS 46. 8% year-over-year, compared to -92. 2% for QVC Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VSCO leads at -2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QVCGB or VSCO?
Victoria's Secret & Co.
(VSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 6% net margin versus -26. 4% for QVC Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VSCO leads at 5. 0% versus 3. 9% for QVCGB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VSCO leads at 36. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QVCGB or VSCO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, QVC Group Inc.
(QVCGB) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 18. 8x for Victoria's Secret & Co. — 18. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — QVCGB or VSCO?
In this comparison, QVCGB (24.
4% yield) pays a dividend. VSCO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is QVCGB or VSCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, QVC Group Inc.
(QVCGB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (24. 4% yield). Victoria's Secret & Co. (VSCO) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QVCGB: +86. 9%, VSCO: +21. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QVCGB and VSCO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: QVCGB is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VSCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. QVCGB pays a dividend while VSCO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.