Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RBBN vs BAND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
RBBN vs BAND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $471M | $1.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $826M | $209.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $31M | $4.11B |
| Gross Margin | 48.7% | 37.3% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | -2.2% |
| Forward P/E | 20.6x | 26.1x |
| Total Debt | $405M | $701M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $96M | $103M |
RBBN vs BAND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ribbon Communicatio… (RBBN) | 100 | 60.9 | -39.1% |
| Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) | 100 | 41.9 | -58.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RBBN vs BAND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RBBN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.49
- Rev growth 1.3%, EPS growth 171.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.49, Low D/E 90.2%, current ratio 1.44x
BAND is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 132.3% 10Y total return vs RBBN's -67.7%
- +278.3% vs RBBN's -13.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.3% revenue growth vs BAND's 0.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.6x vs 26.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs BAND's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.49 vs BAND's 1.86, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +278.3% vs RBBN's -13.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.7% ROA vs BAND's 1.7%, ROIC 2.1% vs -1.2% |
RBBN vs BAND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RBBN vs BAND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RBBN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 253.5x RBBN's $826M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.8% (RBBN) to 2.0% (BAND). On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $826M | $209.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | -$4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $31M | $4.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.7% | +37.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | -2.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +0.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.3% | +1197.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | +39.8% |
Valuation Metrics
RBBN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RBBN's 9.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BAND's 48.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $471M | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $779M | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.18x | -108.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.62x | 26.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.55x | 48.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.56x | 1.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 3.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.06x | 0.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RBBN leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RBBN delivers a 7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $4 for BAND. RBBN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.90x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAND's 1.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RBBN scores 5/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | +4.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | -1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | -1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.90x | 1.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $309M | $598M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $96M | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $405M | $701M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.02x | -10.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BAND leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RBBN five years ago would be worth $4,048 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,808 for BAND. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +278.3% total return vs RBBN's -13.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAND at 60.2% vs RBBN's 0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.6% | +226.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.8% | +278.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.5% | +311.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.5% | -61.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.7% | +132.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.5% | +60.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RBBN and BAND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RBBN is the less volatile stock with a 1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BAND's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAND currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs RBBN's 62.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 1.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.29 | $49.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.80 | $11.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.5% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 93.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 888K | 657K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RBBN as "Buy" and BAND as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.6% upside for RBBN (target: $4) vs -1.0% for BAND (target: $46).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | 0.0% |
RBBN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BAND leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
RBBN vs BAND: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RBBN or BAND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ribbon Communications Inc.
(RBBN) is the stronger pick with 1. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 7% for Bandwidth Inc. (BAND). Ribbon Communications Inc. (RBBN) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ribbon Communications Inc. (RBBN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RBBN or BAND?
On forward P/E, Ribbon Communications Inc.
is actually cheaper at 20. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RBBN or BAND?
Over the past 5 years, Ribbon Communications Inc.
(RBBN) delivered a total return of -59. 5%, compared to -61. 9% for Bandwidth Inc. (BAND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BAND returned +132. 3% versus RBBN's -67. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RBBN or BAND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ribbon Communications Inc.
(RBBN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 49β versus Bandwidth Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning BAND is approximately 24% more volatile than RBBN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ribbon Communications Inc. (RBBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 90% versus 175% for Bandwidth Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RBBN or BAND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ribbon Communications Inc.
(RBBN) is pulling ahead at 1. 3% versus 0. 7% for Bandwidth Inc. (BAND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ribbon Communications Inc. grew EPS 171. 0% year-over-year, compared to -79. 2% for Bandwidth Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BAND leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RBBN or BAND?
Ribbon Communications Inc.
(RBBN) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 7% net margin versus -1. 7% for Bandwidth Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RBBN leads at 2. 4% versus -1. 9% for BAND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RBBN leads at 47. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RBBN or BAND more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ribbon Communications Inc.
(RBBN) trades at 20. 6x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for Bandwidth Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RBBN: 30. 6% to $3. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RBBN or BAND?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is RBBN or BAND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ribbon Communications Inc.
(RBBN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RBBN: -67. 7%, BAND: +132. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RBBN and BAND?
These companies operate in different sectors (RBBN (Communication Services) and BAND (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RBBN is a small-cap deep-value stock; BAND is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.