Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RBLX vs U
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
RBLX vs U — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $31.33B | $11.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.30B | $1.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.10B | $-403M |
| Gross Margin | 78.5% | 70.6% |
| Operating Margin | -24.0% | -25.4% |
| Total Debt | $1.64B | $2.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.21B | $2.06B |
RBLX vs U — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roblox Corporation (RBLX) | 100 | 67.5 | -32.5% |
| Unity Software Inc. (U) | 100 | 27.2 | -72.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RBLX vs U
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RBLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.57
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.0%
- -37.0% 10Y total return vs U's -60.1%
U is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum and efficiency.
- +28.0% vs RBLX's -38.2%
- -6.0% ROA vs RBLX's -12.2%, ROIC -7.8% vs -87.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% revenue growth vs U's 2.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -20.7% margin vs U's -21.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.57 vs U's 2.36 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.0% vs RBLX's -38.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -6.0% ROA vs RBLX's -12.2%, ROIC -7.8% vs -87.7% |
RBLX vs U — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RBLX vs U — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RBLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RBLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 2.9x U's $1.8B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -20.7% (RBLX) to -21.8% (U). On growth, RBLX holds the edge at +39.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.3B | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.1B | -$9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.1B | -$403M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.6B | $404M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.5% | +70.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.0% | -25.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -20.7% | -21.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | +21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.3% | +10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.4% | +30.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RBLX leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31.3B | $11.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31.8B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -28.42x | -28.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 318.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.41x | 6.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 80.50x | 3.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.16x | 29.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
U leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
U delivers a -11.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-12 in annual profit, vs $-3 for RBLX. U carries lower financial leverage with a 0.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RBLX's 4.36x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.9% | -11.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.2% | -6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -87.7% | -7.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.0% | -7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.36x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $431M | $330M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.89x | -15.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RBLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RBLX five years ago would be worth $6,728 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,089 for U. Over the past 12 months, U leads with a +28.0% total return vs RBLX's -38.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RBLX at 6.5% vs U's -1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.9% | -38.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.2% | +28.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.6% | -3.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.7% | -69.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.0% | -60.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.5% | -1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RBLX and U each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RBLX is the less volatile stock with a 1.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than U's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. U currently trades 52.3% from its 52-week high vs RBLX's 29.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.57x | 2.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $150.59 | $52.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.75 | $16.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.1% | +52.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.2 | 64.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.1M | 13.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RBLX as "Buy" and U as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 102.9% upside for RBLX (target: $89) vs 29.4% for U (target: $35).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $88.81 | $35.31 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RBLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). U leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
RBLX vs U: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RBLX or U a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is the stronger pick with 35.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 0% for Unity Software Inc. (U). Analysts rate Roblox Corporation (RBLX) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RBLX or U?
Over the past 5 years, Roblox Corporation (RBLX) delivered a total return of -32.
7%, compared to -69. 1% for Unity Software Inc. (U). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RBLX returned -37. 0% versus U's -60. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RBLX or U?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
57β versus Unity Software Inc. 's 2. 36β — meaning U is approximately 50% more volatile than RBLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Unity Software Inc. (U) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 4% for Roblox Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RBLX or U?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is pulling ahead at 35.
8% versus 2. 0% for Unity Software Inc. (U). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Unity Software Inc. grew EPS 42. 9% year-over-year, compared to -6. 9% for Roblox Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RBLX leads at 30. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RBLX or U?
Unity Software Inc.
(U) is the more profitable company, earning -21. 8% net margin versus -21. 8% for Roblox Corporation — meaning it keeps -21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: U leads at -22. 8% versus -25. 2% for RBLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RBLX leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RBLX or U?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is RBLX or U better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Roblox Corporation (RBLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Unity Software Inc. (U) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RBLX: -37. 0%, U: -60. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RBLX and U?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RBLX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; U is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.