Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RDNT vs AMSF

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RDNT
RadNet, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.45B
5Y Perf.+237.4%
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.

Insurance - Specialty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$569M
5Y Perf.-50.6%

RDNT vs AMSF — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RDNT logoRDNT
AMSF logoAMSF
IndustryMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchInsurance - Specialty
Market Cap$4.45B$569M
Revenue (TTM)$2.04B$325M
Net Income (TTM)$47M$46M
Gross Margin11.2%47.6%
Operating Margin3.0%17.8%
Forward P/E91.8x14.4x
Total Debt$1.86B$491K
Cash & Equiv.$767M$62M

RDNT vs AMSFLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RDNT
AMSF
StockMay 20May 26Return
RadNet, Inc. (RDNT)100337.4+237.4%
AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF)10049.4-50.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RDNT vs AMSF

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMSF leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. RadNet, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
RDNT
RadNet, Inc.
The Income Pick

RDNT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.43
  • Rev growth 11.5%, EPS growth -7.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
  • 9.5% 10Y total return vs AMSF's 31.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

AMSF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 0.32x
  • Beta 0.23, yield 8.4%, current ratio 0.32x
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 91.8x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRDNT logoRDNT11.5% revenue growth vs AMSF's 2.6%
ValueAMSF logoAMSFLower P/E (14.4x vs 91.8x)
Quality / MarginsAMSF logoAMSF14.3% margin vs RDNT's 2.3%
Stability / SafetyAMSF logoAMSFBeta 0.23 vs RDNT's 1.43, lower leverage
DividendsAMSF logoAMSF8.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RDNT logoRDNT+4.6% vs AMSF's -29.2%
Efficiency (ROA)AMSF logoAMSF5.6% ROA vs RDNT's 1.3%, ROIC 21.9% vs 2.0%

RDNT vs AMSF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

RDNTRadNet, Inc.
FY 2025
Commercial Insurance1
58.8%$1.1B
Medicare1
24.8%$477M
Capitation Arrangements
6.5%$126M
Health Care, Other
3.4%$65M
Medicaid1
2.7%$52M
Workers' Compensation/Personal Injury1
2.3%$45M
Health Care, Management Service
1.4%$28M
AMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RDNT vs AMSF — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMSFLAGGINGRDNT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AMSF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

RDNT is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 6.3x AMSF's $325M. AMSF is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RDNT's 2.3%. On growth, RDNT holds the edge at +14.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRDNT logoRDNTRadNet, Inc.AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.0B$325M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$214M$58M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$47M$46M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$178M$8M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+11.2%+47.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.0%+17.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.3%+14.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.7%+2.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.8%+10.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-114.1%-8.5%
AMSF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMSF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, AMSF's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RDNT's 25.9x.

MetricRDNT logoRDNTRadNet, Inc.AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$4.5B$569M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.5B$508M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-230.00x12.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.91.75x14.42x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.88x8.53x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.18x1.80x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.19x2.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF52.01x63.83x
AMSF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMSF leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

AMSF delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $4 for RDNT. AMSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RDNT's 1.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSF scores 7/9 vs RDNT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricRDNT logoRDNTRadNet, Inc.AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.8%+9.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.3%+5.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.0%+21.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.1%+16.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.37x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.1B-$61M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$767M$62M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.9B$491,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.46x
AMSF leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RDNT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RDNT five years ago would be worth $24,710 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,110 for AMSF. Over the past 12 months, RDNT leads with a +4.6% total return vs AMSF's -29.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RDNT at 26.0% vs AMSF's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRDNT logoRDNTRadNet, Inc.AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-19.0%-18.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+4.6%-29.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+100.0%-24.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+147.1%-18.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+947.4%+31.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.0%-9.1%
RDNT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — RDNT and AMSF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AMSF is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RDNT's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RDNT currently trades 67.0% from its 52-week high vs AMSF's 62.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRDNT logoRDNTRadNet, Inc.AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.43x0.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$85.84$48.54
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$50.76$29.42
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+67.0%+62.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.334.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded822K212K
Evenly matched — RDNT and AMSF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates RDNT as "Buy" and AMSF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.0% upside for RDNT (target: $92) vs 46.9% for AMSF (target: $45). AMSF is the only dividend payer here at 8.41% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricRDNT logoRDNTRadNet, Inc.AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$92.00$44.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts116
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+8.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.55
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.1%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

AMSF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RDNT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallAMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RDNT vs AMSF: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RDNT or AMSF a better buy right now?

For growth investors, RadNet, Inc.

(RDNT) is the stronger pick with 11. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RadNet, Inc. (RDNT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RDNT or AMSF?

On forward P/E, AMERISAFE, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RDNT or AMSF?

Over the past 5 years, RadNet, Inc.

(RDNT) delivered a total return of +147. 1%, compared to -18. 9% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RDNT returned +947. 4% versus AMSF's +31. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RDNT or AMSF?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus RadNet, Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning RDNT is approximately 517% more volatile than AMSF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 137% for RadNet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RDNT or AMSF?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), RadNet, Inc.

(RDNT) is pulling ahead at 11. 5% versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AMERISAFE, Inc. grew EPS -14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -768. 4% for RadNet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RDNT leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RDNT or AMSF?

AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 9% net margin versus 2. 3% for RadNet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMSF leads at 18. 6% versus 3. 0% for RDNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMSF leads at 46. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RDNT or AMSF more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 91. 8x for RadNet, Inc. — 77. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RDNT: 60. 0% to $92. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RDNT or AMSF?

In this comparison, AMSF (8.

4% yield) pays a dividend. RDNT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is RDNT or AMSF better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 8. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMSF: +31. 8%, RDNT: +947. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RDNT and AMSF?

These companies operate in different sectors (RDNT (Healthcare) and AMSF (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: RDNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMSF is a small-cap deep-value stock. AMSF pays a dividend while RDNT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

RDNT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMSF

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform RDNT and AMSF on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(RDNT: 14.8% · AMSF: 10.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(RDNT: 2.3% · AMSF: 14.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.