Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
REX vs GPRE vs ANDE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Food Distribution
REX vs GPRE vs ANDE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $1.58B | $1.19B | $2.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $651M | $2.09B | $10.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $-121M | $129M |
| Gross Margin | 12.7% | 1.8% | 6.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | -4.0% | 1.1% |
| Forward P/E | 62.0x | 48.1x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $508M | $1.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $196M | $230M | $98M |
REX vs GPRE vs ANDE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| REX American Resour… (REX) | 100 | 491.5 | +391.5% |
| Green Plains Inc. (GPRE) | 100 | 198.5 | +98.5% |
| The Andersons, Inc. (ANDE) | 100 | 526.5 | +426.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: REX vs GPRE vs ANDE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
REX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 448.8% 10Y total return vs ANDE's 156.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 8.64x
- Beta 0.36, current ratio 8.64x
GPRE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +363.7% vs ANDE's +97.5%
ANDE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 1.2%
- Rev growth -2.2%, EPS growth -15.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.0%
- PEG 0.22 vs REX's 1.16
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.2% revenue growth vs REX's -22.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 48.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.7% margin vs GPRE's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.36 vs GPRE's 1.22, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; 23-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +363.7% vs ANDE's +97.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs GPRE's -7.7%, ROIC 11.4% vs -5.3% |
REX vs GPRE vs ANDE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
REX vs GPRE vs ANDE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ANDE is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 16.9x REX's $651M. REX is the more profitable business, keeping 7.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPRE's -5.8%. On growth, REX holds the edge at +0.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $651M | $2.1B | $11.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $67M | $14M | $218M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | -$121M | $129M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18M | $74M | -$105M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +1.8% | +6.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | -4.0% | +1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | -5.8% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +3.5% | -1.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.4% | -26.6% | -1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +119.8% | +96.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ANDE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.4x trailing earnings, ANDE trades at a 16% valuation discount to REX's 29.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ANDE offers better value at 0.38x vs REX's 0.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $1.5B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.10x | -9.43x | 24.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 61.96x | 48.06x | 13.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.55x | — | 0.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.35x | 102.96x | 12.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 0.57x | 0.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.63x | 1.48x | 1.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.09x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
REX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ANDE delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-16 for GPRE. REX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ANDE's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ANDE scores 6/9 vs GPRE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.7% | -15.7% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.7% | -7.7% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.4% | -5.3% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | -6.2% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.66x | 0.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$175M | $278M | $945M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $196M | $230M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $508M | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.88x | 2.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REX five years ago would be worth $35,231 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,303 for GPRE. Over the past 12 months, GPRE leads with a +363.7% total return vs ANDE's +97.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REX at 50.1% vs GPRE's -18.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +48.2% | +65.1% | +29.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +141.8% | +363.7% | +97.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +238.4% | -45.2% | +90.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +252.3% | -47.0% | +132.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +448.8% | +17.1% | +156.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.1% | -18.2% | +23.9% |
Risk & Volatility
REX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REX is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPRE's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REX currently trades 90.0% from its 52-week high vs ANDE's 83.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 1.22x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.36 | $18.94 | $82.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.44 | $3.39 | $31.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.0% | +89.6% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.2 | 68.5 | 70.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 203K | 1.4M | 323K |
Analyst Outlook
ANDE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: REX as "Buy", GPRE as "Buy", ANDE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.9% upside for REX (target: $60) vs -18.7% for GPRE (target: $14). ANDE is the only dividend payer here at 1.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $60.00 | $13.80 | $75.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 20 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +2.5% | +0.7% |
REX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ANDE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
REX vs GPRE vs ANDE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is REX or GPRE or ANDE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Andersons, Inc.
(ANDE) is the stronger pick with -2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 9% for REX American Resources Corporation (REX). The Andersons, Inc. (ANDE) offers the better valuation at 24. 4x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate REX American Resources Corporation (REX) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — REX or GPRE or ANDE?
On trailing P/E, The Andersons, Inc.
(ANDE) is the cheapest at 24. 4x versus REX American Resources Corporation at 29. 1x. On forward P/E, The Andersons, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Andersons, Inc. wins at 0. 22x versus REX American Resources Corporation's 1. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — REX or GPRE or ANDE?
Over the past 5 years, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) delivered a total return of +252.
3%, compared to -47. 0% for Green Plains Inc. (GPRE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REX returned +448. 8% versus GPRE's +17. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — REX or GPRE or ANDE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), REX American Resources Corporation (REX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
36β versus Green Plains Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning GPRE is approximately 234% more volatile than REX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 81% for The Andersons, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — REX or GPRE or ANDE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Andersons, Inc.
(ANDE) is pulling ahead at -2. 2% versus -22. 9% for REX American Resources Corporation (REX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: REX American Resources Corporation grew EPS -4. 9% year-over-year, compared to -39. 5% for Green Plains Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REX leads at -6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — REX or GPRE or ANDE?
REX American Resources Corporation (REX) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
1% net margin versus -5. 8% for Green Plains Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REX leads at 10. 0% versus -4. 0% for GPRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REX leads at 14. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is REX or GPRE or ANDE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Andersons, Inc. (ANDE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus REX American Resources Corporation's 1. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Andersons, Inc. (ANDE) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 62. 0x for REX American Resources Corporation — 48. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REX: 24. 9% to $60. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — REX or GPRE or ANDE?
In this comparison, ANDE (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. REX, GPRE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is REX or GPRE or ANDE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Andersons, Inc.
(ANDE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 1. 2% yield, +156. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ANDE: +156. 6%, GPRE: +17. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between REX and GPRE and ANDE?
These companies operate in different sectors (REX (Basic Materials) and GPRE (Basic Materials) and ANDE (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
ANDE pays a dividend while REX, GPRE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.