ROG
Rogers Corporation
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$2.51B
5Y Perf.+29.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ROG vs KLIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
KLIC
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$4.91B
5Y Perf.+319.4%
ROG vs KLIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ROG | KLIC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.51B | $4.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $813M | $768M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-56M | $55M |
| Gross Margin | 31.6% | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | 6.7% |
| Forward P/E | 38.6x | 35.7x |
| Total Debt | $40M | $39M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $197M | $216M |
ROG vs KLIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ROG
KLIC
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rogers Corporation (ROG) | 100 | 129.9 | +29.9% |
| Kulicke and Soffa I… (KLIC) | 100 | 419.4 | +319.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ROG vs KLIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: KLIC leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Rogers Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ROG
Rogers Corporation
The Income Pick
ROG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.24
- Rev growth -2.3%, EPS growth -340.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 3.97x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KLIC
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
KLIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 7.8% 10Y total return vs ROG's 122.4%
- Lower P/E (35.7x vs 38.6x)
- 7.2% margin vs ROG's -6.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ROG | -2.3% revenue growth vs KLIC's -7.4% |
| Value | KLIC | Lower P/E (35.7x vs 38.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | KLIC | 7.2% margin vs ROG's -6.9% |
| Stability / Safety | ROG | Beta 1.24 vs KLIC's 1.87, lower leverage |
| Dividends | KLIC | 1.1% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | KLIC | +198.0% vs ROG's +123.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | KLIC | 4.9% ROA vs ROG's -3.9%, ROIC -0.3% vs 3.6% |
ROG vs KLIC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2024
ROG vs KLIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLKLICLAGGINGROG
ROGRogers Corporation
1leads
KLICKulicke and Soffa Ind…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ROGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
KLIC4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ROG5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
KLIC6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
KLIC6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
KLIC1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KLIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROG and KLIC operate at a comparable scale, with $813M and $768M in trailing revenue. KLIC is the more profitable business, keeping 7.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ROG's -6.9%. On growth, KLIC holds the edge at +49.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ROGRogers Corporation | KLICKulicke and Soffa… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $813M | $768M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35M | $59M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$56M | $55M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $100M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.6% | +48.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +6.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | +7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +1.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.2% | +49.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | +141.5% |
KLIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ROG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ROG's 22.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KLIC's 320.7x.
| Metric | ROGRogers Corporation | KLICKulicke and Soffa… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -41.84x | 9999.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 38.62x | 35.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.38x | 320.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.09x | 7.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.16x | 6.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.27x | 50.93x |
ROG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KLIC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KLIC delivers a 6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-5 for ROG. ROG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KLIC's 0.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KLIC scores 7/9 vs ROG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ROGRogers Corporation | KLICKulicke and Soffa… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.7% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.9% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | -0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$157M | -$177M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $197M | $216M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40M | $39M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 64.38x | 4872.17x |
KLIC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KLIC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KLIC five years ago would be worth $20,118 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,363 for ROG. Over the past 12 months, KLIC leads with a +198.0% total return vs ROG's +123.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KLIC at 27.2% vs ROG's -4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ROGRogers Corporation | KLICKulicke and Soffa… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +52.9% | +94.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +123.4% | +198.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.7% | +105.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.4% | +101.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.4% | +775.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.4% | +27.2% |
KLIC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ROG and KLIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ROG is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KLIC's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ROGRogers Corporation | KLICKulicke and Soffa… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $143.81 | $95.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.17 | $29.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.9 | 74.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 199K | 575K |
Evenly matched — ROG and KLIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
KLIC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ROG as "Buy" and KLIC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.7% upside for ROG (target: $150) vs -33.4% for KLIC (target: $63). KLIC is the only dividend payer here at 1.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ROGRogers Corporation | KLICKulicke and Soffa… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $150.00 | $62.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +2.0% |
KLIC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
KLIC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ROG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallKulicke and Soffa Industrie… (KLIC)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ROG vs KLIC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ROG or KLIC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rogers Corporation (ROG) is the stronger pick with -2.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC) offers the better valuation at 9999. 0x trailing P/E (35. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rogers Corporation (ROG) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ROG or KLIC?
On forward P/E, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 35. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ROG or KLIC?
Over the past 5 years, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) delivered a total return of +101. 2%, compared to -26. 4% for Rogers Corporation (ROG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KLIC returned +775. 4% versus ROG's +122. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ROG or KLIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rogers Corporation (ROG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
24β versus Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning KLIC is approximately 51% more volatile than ROG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rogers Corporation (ROG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ROG or KLIC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rogers Corporation (ROG) is pulling ahead at -2.
3% versus -7. 4% for Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. grew EPS 100. 3% year-over-year, compared to -340. 0% for Rogers Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROG leads at -5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ROG or KLIC?
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -7. 6% for Rogers Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROG leads at 6. 4% versus -0. 5% for KLIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KLIC leads at 42. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ROG or KLIC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) trades at 35. 7x forward P/E versus 38. 6x for Rogers Corporation — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ROG: 6. 7% to $150. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ROG or KLIC?
In this comparison, KLIC (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. ROG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ROG or KLIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
(KLIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 1% yield, +775. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KLIC: +775. 4%, ROG: +122. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ROG and KLIC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
KLIC pays a dividend while ROG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ROG: 5.2% · KLIC: 49.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.