Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
ROIV vs BHVN vs IMVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ROIV vs BHVN vs IMVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $20.91B | $1.06B | $5.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-809M | $-648M | $-464M |
| Gross Margin | 91.2% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -91.3% | — | — |
| Total Debt | $100M | $279M | $98K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.72B | $230M | $714M |
ROIV vs BHVN vs IMVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roivant Sciences Lt… (ROIV) | 100 | 895.0 | +795.0% |
| Biohaven Ltd. (BHVN) | 100 | 159.4 | +59.4% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 513.8 | +413.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ROIV vs BHVN vs IMVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ROIV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.95
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 33.47x
- Beta 0.95, current ratio 33.47x
BHVN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 26.1%
- 27.3% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
- 3.2% margin vs ROIV's -60.8%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 188.1% 10Y total return vs ROIV's 177.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.3% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs ROIV's -60.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs IMVT's 1.37 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +160.6% vs BHVN's -47.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -15.5% ROA vs BHVN's -138.0%, ROIC -50.4% vs -242.1% |
ROIV vs BHVN vs IMVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ROIV vs BHVN vs IMVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ROIV leads in 3 of 6 categories
BHVN leads 1 • IMVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BHVN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROIV and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $13M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.2B | -$646M | -$487M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$809M | -$648M | -$464M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$767M | -$594M | -$423M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +91.2% | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -91.3% | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -60.8% | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -57.6% | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -77.8% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.7% | +59.4% | +19.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ROIV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.9B | $1.1B | $5.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.3B | $1.1B | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -120.08x | -1.46x | -10.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 719.58x | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.03x | 20.75x | 6.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ROIV leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ROIV delivers a -16.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-16 in annual profit, vs $-9 for BHVN. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BHVN's 5.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ROIV scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.3% | -8.7% | -47.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.5% | -138.0% | -44.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.4% | -2.4% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.4% | -187.2% | -66.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 5.36x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.6B | $49M | -$714M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.7B | $230M | $714M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $100M | $279M | $98,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ROIV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ROIV five years ago would be worth $29,082 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,753 for BHVN. Over the past 12 months, ROIV leads with a +160.6% total return vs BHVN's -47.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ROIV at 47.6% vs BHVN's -10.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.4% | -7.4% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +160.6% | -47.6% | +107.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +221.7% | -29.3% | +48.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +190.8% | +37.5% | +73.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +177.1% | +37.5% | +188.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.6% | -10.9% | +14.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ROIV and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ROIV is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs BHVN's 45.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.35x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.33 | $22.22 | $30.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.58 | $7.48 | $13.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +45.2% | +95.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 48.5 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.9M | 2.0M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ROIV as "Buy", BHVN as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 112.1% upside for BHVN (target: $21) vs 15.2% for ROIV (target: $33).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.20 | $21.29 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 25 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ROIV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BHVN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ROIV vs BHVN vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ROIV or BHVN or IMVT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Roivant Sciences Ltd.
(ROIV) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ROIV or BHVN or IMVT?
Over the past 5 years, Roivant Sciences Ltd.
(ROIV) delivered a total return of +190. 8%, compared to +37. 5% for Biohaven Ltd. (BHVN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +188. 1% versus BHVN's +37. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ROIV or BHVN or IMVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Roivant Sciences Ltd.
(ROIV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning IMVT is approximately 44% more volatile than ROIV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Biohaven Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ROIV or BHVN or IMVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Biohaven Ltd.
grew EPS 26. 1% year-over-year, compared to -104. 6% for Roivant Sciences Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ROIV or BHVN or IMVT?
Biohaven Ltd.
(BHVN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -592. 0% for Roivant Sciences Ltd. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BHVN leads at 0. 0% versus -34. 5% for ROIV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROIV leads at 96. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ROIV or BHVN or IMVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ROIV or BHVN or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Roivant Sciences Ltd.
(ROIV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), +177. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ROIV: +177. 1%, BHVN: +37. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ROIV and BHVN and IMVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.