RPM vs AXTA

For growth investors, RPM International Inc.

(RPM) is the stronger pick with 0. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 0% for Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA). Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RPM International Inc. (RPM) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.

(AXTA) is the cheapest at 16. 4x versus RPM International Inc. at 19. 1x. On forward P/E, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. wins at 0. 41x versus RPM International Inc. 's 1. 04x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, RPM International Inc.

(RPM) delivered a total return of +14. 3%, compared to -14. 8% for Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RPM returned +134. 8% versus AXTA's +1. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RPM International Inc.

(RPM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. 's 1. 13β — meaning AXTA is approximately 12% more volatile than RPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RPM International Inc. (RPM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 103% versus 142% for Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), RPM International Inc.

(RPM) is pulling ahead at 0. 5% versus -3. 0% for Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RPM International Inc. grew EPS 17. 3% year-over-year, compared to -2. 2% for Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RPM leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

RPM International Inc.

(RPM) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 3% net margin versus 7. 4% for Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. — meaning it keeps 9. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AXTA leads at 14. 9% versus 12. 3% for RPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RPM leads at 41. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 41x versus RPM International Inc. 's 1. 04x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for RPM International Inc. — 7. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AXTA: 22. 1% to $34. 86.

In this comparison, RPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. AXTA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, RPM International Inc.

(RPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), 1. 9% yield, +134. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RPM: +134. 8%, AXTA: +1. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: RPM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AXTA is a small-cap deep-value stock. RPM pays a dividend while AXTA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.