RRC vs CNX

For growth investors, CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) is the stronger pick with 59.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 27. 6% for Range Resources Corporation (RRC). CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Range Resources Corporation (RRC) a "Hold" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) is the cheapest at 9.

2x versus Range Resources Corporation at 15. 0x. On forward P/E, Range Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Range Resources Corporation (RRC) delivered a total return of +279.

9%, compared to +167. 0% for CNX Resources Corporation (CNX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNX returned +145. 5% versus RRC's +2. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

12β versus Range Resources Corporation's 0. 23β — meaning RRC is approximately 92% more volatile than CNX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Range Resources Corporation (RRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 57% for CNX Resources Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) is pulling ahead at 59.

2% versus 27. 6% for Range Resources Corporation (RRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CNX Resources Corporation grew EPS 763. 3% year-over-year, compared to 151. 4% for Range Resources Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RRC leads at -17. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) is the more profitable company, earning 29.

6% net margin versus 22. 0% for Range Resources Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNX leads at 36. 8% versus 27. 9% for RRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNX leads at 47. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Range Resources Corporation (RRC) trades at 9.

6x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for CNX Resources Corporation — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RRC: 13. 1% to $46. 57.

In this comparison, RRC (0.

9% yield) pays a dividend. CNX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Range Resources Corporation (RRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

23), 0. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RRC: +2. 0%, CNX: +145. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

RRC pays a dividend while CNX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.