Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RWAY vs HRZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
RWAY vs HRZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $247M | $199M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $40M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $32M | $28M |
| Gross Margin | 78.5% | 18.0% |
| Operating Margin | 54.7% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | 5.0x | 6.1x |
| Total Debt | $450M | $473M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $106M |
RWAY vs HRZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Runway Growth Finan… (RWAY) | 100 | 52.7 | -47.3% |
| Horizon Technology … (HRZN) | 100 | 25.8 | -74.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RWAY vs HRZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RWAY is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 9.9% vs HRZN's 7.1%
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 6.1x)
- -8.7% vs HRZN's -23.2%
HRZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 27.8%
- Rev growth 17.9%, EPS growth 7.6%
- 52.9% 10Y total return vs RWAY's 6.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.9% NII/revenue growth vs RWAY's 12.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 6.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs RWAY's 0.2% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs RWAY's 0.72 | |
| Dividends | 27.8% yield, vs RWAY's 20.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -8.7% vs HRZN's -23.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs RWAY's 0.2% |
RWAY vs HRZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RWAY leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RWAY is the larger business by revenue, generating $140M annually — 3.5x HRZN's $40M. RWAY is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HRZN's -6.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $40M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $75M | $19M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $32M | $28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $54M | $67M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.5% | +18.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +54.7% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | -6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +132.9% | +141.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -29.6% |
Valuation Metrics
RWAY leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.3x trailing earnings, HRZN trades at a 42% valuation discount to RWAY's 7.3x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $247M | $199M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $679M | $567M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.34x | 4.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.95x | 6.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.84x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.76x | 4.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.52x | 0.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.32x | 3.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RWAY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRZN delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $7 for RWAY. RWAY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.93x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRZN's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RWAY scores 7/9 vs HRZN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | -0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.93x | 1.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $432M | $368M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $450M | $473M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.69x | 0.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RWAY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RWAY five years ago would be worth $10,597 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,724 for HRZN. Over the past 12 months, RWAY leads with a -8.7% total return vs HRZN's -23.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RWAY at 1.2% vs HRZN's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.8% | -26.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.7% | -23.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.5% | -27.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.0% | -32.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.0% | +52.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.2% | -10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RWAY and HRZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HRZN is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RWAY's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RWAY currently trades 59.9% from its 52-week high vs HRZN's 53.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.41 | $8.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.36 | $3.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.9% | +53.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 599K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
HRZN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RWAY as "Hold" and HRZN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 46.4% upside for RWAY (target: $10) vs 44.1% for HRZN (target: $7). For income investors, HRZN offers the higher dividend yield at 27.80% vs RWAY's 20.53%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $6.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +20.5% | +27.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | $1.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.1% | 0.0% |
RWAY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HRZN leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
RWAY vs HRZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RWAY or HRZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the stronger pick with 17.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 8% for Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY). Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY) a "Hold" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RWAY or HRZN?
On trailing P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the cheapest at 4.
3x versus Runway Growth Finance Corp. at 7. 3x. On forward P/E, Runway Growth Finance Corp. is actually cheaper at 5. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RWAY or HRZN?
Over the past 5 years, Runway Growth Finance Corp.
(RWAY) delivered a total return of +6. 0%, compared to -32. 8% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HRZN returned +52. 9% versus RWAY's +6. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RWAY or HRZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus Runway Growth Finance Corp. 's 0. 72β — meaning RWAY is approximately 2% more volatile than HRZN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 93% versus 149% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RWAY or HRZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is pulling ahead at 17.
9% versus 12. 8% for Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation grew EPS 756. 3% year-over-year, compared to -50. 8% for Runway Growth Finance Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RWAY or HRZN?
Runway Growth Finance Corp.
(RWAY) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -6. 6% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RWAY leads at 54. 7% versus -4. 0% for HRZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RWAY leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RWAY or HRZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Runway Growth Finance Corp.
(RWAY) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 6. 1x for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RWAY: 46. 4% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RWAY or HRZN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the highest yield at 27. 8%, versus 20. 5% for Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY).
09Is RWAY or HRZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), 27. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HRZN: +52. 9%, RWAY: +6. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RWAY and HRZN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RWAY is a small-cap deep-value stock; HRZN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Dividend Yield > 11.1%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.