Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RZLT vs CGEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Pharmaceuticals
RZLT vs CGEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Pharmaceuticals |
| Market Cap | $295M | $905M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-84M | $-221M |
| Total Debt | $2M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $94M | $88M |
RZLT vs CGEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rezolute, Inc. (RZLT) | 100 | 19.3 | -80.7% |
| Cullinan Therapeuti… (CGEM) | 100 | 38.7 | -61.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RZLT vs CGEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RZLT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.79
- EPS growth 26.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 14.37x
CGEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -50.8% 10Y total return vs RZLT's -93.6%
- 5.0% margin vs RZLT's 3.1%
- +91.2% vs RZLT's -14.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -18.4% revenue growth vs CGEM's -23.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.0% margin vs RZLT's 3.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs CGEM's 1.68 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +91.2% vs RZLT's -14.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -47.6% ROA vs RZLT's -60.8%, ROIC -43.5% vs -97.9% |
RZLT vs CGEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CGEM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RZLT and CGEM operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$64M | -$240M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$84M | -$221M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$77M | -$142M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RZLT and CGEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $295M | $905M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $203M | $819M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.15x | -3.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CGEM leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CGEM delivers a -51.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-51 in annual profit, vs $-66 for RZLT. CGEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RZLT's 0.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RZLT scores 4/9 vs CGEM's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -65.8% | -51.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.8% | -47.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -97.9% | -43.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -55.7% | -48.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$92M | -$86M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $94M | $88M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CGEM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CGEM five years ago would be worth $4,930 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,754 for RZLT. Over the past 12 months, CGEM leads with a +91.2% total return vs RZLT's -14.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CGEM at 15.7% vs RZLT's 9.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +42.7% | +45.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.4% | +91.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.6% | +54.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.5% | -50.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.6% | -50.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.9% | +15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RZLT and CGEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RZLT is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CGEM's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CGEM currently trades 87.9% from its 52-week high vs RZLT's 27.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 1.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.46 | $16.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $5.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.0% | +87.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 775K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RZLT as "Buy" and CGEM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 111.5% upside for CGEM (target: $31) vs 104.9% for RZLT (target: $6).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.33 | $31.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CGEM leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
RZLT vs CGEM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RZLT or CGEM a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Rezolute, Inc.
(RZLT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RZLT or CGEM?
Over the past 5 years, Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc.
(CGEM) delivered a total return of -50. 7%, compared to -52. 5% for Rezolute, Inc. (RZLT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CGEM returned -50. 8% versus RZLT's -93. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RZLT or CGEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rezolute, Inc.
(RZLT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning CGEM is approximately 113% more volatile than RZLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc. (CGEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 1% for Rezolute, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RZLT or CGEM?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rezolute, Inc.
grew EPS 26. 3% year-over-year, compared to -19. 6% for Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RZLT or CGEM?
Rezolute, Inc.
(RZLT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RZLT leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for CGEM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RZLT leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RZLT or CGEM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is RZLT or CGEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rezolute, Inc.
(RZLT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79)). Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc. (CGEM) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RZLT: -93. 6%, CGEM: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RZLT and CGEM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.