Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SARO vs TDG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
SARO vs TDG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $8.78B | $69.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.06B | $9.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $277M | $1.97B |
| Gross Margin | 15.2% | 59.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.1% | 46.5% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | 31.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.45B | $30.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $290M | $2.81B |
SARO vs TDG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| StandardAero, Inc. (SARO) | 100 | 91.0 | -9.0% |
| TransDigm Group Inc… (TDG) | 100 | 94.7 | -5.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SARO vs TDG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SARO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.8%, EPS growth 20.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.5%
- 15.8% revenue growth vs TDG's 11.2%
- Lower P/E (20.8x vs 31.8x)
TDG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 13.4%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs SARO's -19.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, current ratio 3.21x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.8% revenue growth vs TDG's 11.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.8x vs 31.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs SARO's 4.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs SARO's 1.27 | |
| Dividends | 13.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -3.6% vs TDG's -4.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs SARO's 4.2%, ROIC 20.9% vs 8.7% |
SARO vs TDG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SARO vs TDG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.1B annually — 1.5x SARO's $6.1B. TDG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SARO's 4.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.1B | $9.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $696M | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $277M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $155M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +59.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +46.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +20.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.5% | +13.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.6% | -13.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SARO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 31.6x trailing earnings, SARO trades at a 18% valuation discount to TDG's 38.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TDG's 21.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SARO's 27.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.8B | $69.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.9B | $96.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.64x | 38.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.79x | 31.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.01x | 21.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.45x | 7.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.29x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.49x | 38.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SARO scores 8/9 vs TDG's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +20.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.8% | +20.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.92x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.2B | $27.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $290M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $30.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.31x | 2.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TDG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TDG five years ago would be worth $24,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,018 for SARO. Over the past 12 months, SARO leads with a -3.6% total return vs TDG's -4.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TDG at 22.9% vs SARO's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.4% | -9.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.6% | -4.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.8% | +85.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.8% | +142.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.8% | +596.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.1% | +22.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SARO and TDG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TDG is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SARO's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.48 | $1623.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.83 | $1123.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.2% | +76.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 371K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SARO as "Hold" and TDG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.9% upside for SARO (target: $37) vs 31.1% for TDG (target: $1618). TDG is the only dividend payer here at 13.41% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | $1617.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +13.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $165.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% |
TDG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SARO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SARO vs TDG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SARO or TDG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, StandardAero, Inc.
(SARO) is the stronger pick with 15. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 2% for TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG). StandardAero, Inc. (SARO) offers the better valuation at 31. 6x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) a "Buy" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SARO or TDG?
On trailing P/E, StandardAero, Inc.
(SARO) is the cheapest at 31. 6x versus TransDigm Group Incorporated at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, StandardAero, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SARO or TDG?
Over the past 5 years, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) delivered a total return of +142.
4%, compared to -19. 8% for StandardAero, Inc. (SARO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TDG returned +596. 5% versus SARO's -19. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SARO or TDG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus StandardAero, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning SARO is approximately 61% more volatile than TDG relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SARO or TDG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), StandardAero, Inc.
(SARO) is pulling ahead at 15. 8% versus 11. 2% for TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: StandardAero, Inc. grew EPS 20. 9% year-over-year, compared to 25. 2% for TransDigm Group Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TDG leads at 17. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SARO or TDG?
TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
5% net margin versus 4. 6% for StandardAero, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDG leads at 47. 2% versus 9. 1% for SARO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDG leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SARO or TDG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, StandardAero, Inc.
(SARO) trades at 20. 8x forward P/E versus 31. 8x for TransDigm Group Incorporated — 11. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SARO: 40. 9% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SARO or TDG?
In this comparison, TDG (13.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SARO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SARO or TDG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 13. 4% yield, +596. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDG: +596. 5%, SARO: -19. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SARO and TDG?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SARO is a small-cap high-growth stock; TDG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. TDG pays a dividend while SARO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.