SCCG
Sachem Capital Corp. 8.00% Note
REIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$1.15B
5Y Perf.-3.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SCCG vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
Asset Management
Market Cap$226M
5Y Perf.-58.4%
SCCG vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SCCG | TPVG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $1.15B | $226M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $46M |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | 401.2x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $20M |
SCCG vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SCCG
TPVG
| Stock | Aug 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCG) | 100 | 96.9 | -3.1% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 41.6 | -58.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCCG vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TPVG leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Sachem Capital Corp. 8.00% Note is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SCCG
Sachem Capital Corp. 8.00% Note
The Real Estate Income Play
SCCG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.09, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.09
- Beta 0.09, yield 0.8%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 87.8% 10Y total return vs SCCG's 25.1%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs SCCG's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TPVG | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs SCCG's -100.0% |
| Value | TPVG | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 401.2x) |
| Stability / Safety | SCCG | Beta 0.09 vs TPVG's 0.83 |
| Dividends | TPVG | 18.4% yield, vs SCCG's 0.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SCCG | +29.8% vs TPVG's +8.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TPVG | 5.6% ROA vs SCCG's 0.4% |
SCCG vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSCCGLAGGINGTPVG
TPVGTriplePoint Venture G…
2leads
SCCGSachem Capital Corp. …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TPVGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SCCG1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TPVG3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SCCG5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SCCG2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TPVG1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCCG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG and SCCG operate at a comparable scale, with $97M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | SCCGSachem Capital Co… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | $63M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $46M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.4% | -100.0% |
SCCG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.6x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 99% valuation discount to SCCG's 601.8x P/E.
| Metric | SCCGSachem Capital Co… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $226M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $674M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 601.75x | 4.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 401.17x | 6.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.45x | 0.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 459.11x | — |
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SCCG and TPVG each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $1 for SCCG.
| Metric | SCCGSachem Capital Co… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.0% | +13.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.15x |
Evenly matched — SCCG and TPVG each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SCCG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCCG five years ago would be worth $12,510 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,097 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, SCCG leads with a +29.8% total return vs TPVG's +8.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SCCG at 11.1% vs TPVG's -2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SCCGSachem Capital Co… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.5% | -12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.8% | +8.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.3% | -7.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.1% | -19.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.1% | +87.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.1% | -2.6% |
SCCG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCCG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCCG is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCCG currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs TPVG's 74.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SCCGSachem Capital Co… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.09x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.55 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.58 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +74.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 498K |
SCCG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TPVG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 18.40% vs SCCG's 0.84%.
| Metric | SCCGSachem Capital Co… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +18.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TPVG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
SCCG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TPVG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Best OverallSachem Capital Corp. 8.00% … (SCCG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SCCG vs TPVG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCCG or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note (SCCG). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCCG or TPVG?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 6x versus Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note at 601. 8x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCCG or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, Sachem Capital Corp.
8. 00% Note (SCCG) delivered a total return of +25. 1%, compared to -19. 0% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +87. 8% versus SCCG's +25. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCCG or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sachem Capital Corp.
8. 00% Note (SCCG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 09β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning TPVG is approximately 787% more volatile than SCCG relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SCCG or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -100. 0% for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note (SCCG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note grew EPS 104. 3% year-over-year, compared to 48. 8% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCCG or TPVG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 0. 0% for SCCG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SCCG or TPVG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 401. 2x for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note — 395. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SCCG or TPVG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the highest yield at 18. 4%, versus 0. 8% for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note (SCCG).
09Is SCCG or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sachem Capital Corp.
8. 00% Note (SCCG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 09), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCG: +25. 1%, TPVG: +87. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SCCG and TPVG?
These companies operate in different sectors (SCCG (Real Estate) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SCCG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SCCG: -205.3% · TPVG: 36.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(SCCG: 601.8x · TPVG: 4.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.