Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SCSC vs AVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
SCSC vs AVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $886M | $6.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.02B | $24.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $74M | $214M |
| Gross Margin | 13.7% | 10.5% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 16.8x |
| Total Debt | $147M | $2.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $126M | $192M |
SCSC vs AVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) | 100 | 166.0 | +66.0% |
| Avnet, Inc. (AVT) | 100 | 307.3 | +207.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCSC vs AVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SCSC is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 16.8x)
- 2.4% margin vs AVT's 0.9%
- 4.2% ROA vs AVT's 1.7%, ROIC 7.0% vs 6.0%
AVT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth -6.6%, EPS growth -49.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.0%
- 137.5% 10Y total return vs SCSC's 2.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -6.6% revenue growth vs SCSC's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 16.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs AVT's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs SCSC's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.2% vs SCSC's +13.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs AVT's 1.7%, ROIC 7.0% vs 6.0% |
SCSC vs AVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SCSC vs AVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVT is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.0B annually — 8.3x SCSC's $3.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.4% (SCSC) to 0.9% (AVT). On growth, AVT holds the edge at +33.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $25.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $121M | $781M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $74M | $214M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $119M | $33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +10.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +33.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +12.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SCSC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, SCSC trades at a 55% valuation discount to AVT's 30.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SCSC's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVT's 12.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $886M | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $907M | $9.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.64x | 30.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.36x | 16.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.86x | 12.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 0.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.51x | 11.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCSC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCSC delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $4 for AVT. SCSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVT's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCSC scores 7/9 vs AVT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | $2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $126M | $192M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $147M | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.30x | 2.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVT five years ago would be worth $20,618 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,973 for SCSC. Over the past 12 months, AVT leads with a +73.2% total return vs SCSC's +13.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVT at 28.4% vs SCSC's 15.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.8% | +70.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.9% | +73.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.1% | +111.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.7% | +106.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.3% | +137.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.8% | +28.4% |
Risk & Volatility
AVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVT is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SCSC's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVT currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs SCSC's 88.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.25 | $84.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.76 | $44.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.5% | +98.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.2 | 75.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 198K | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SCSC as "Hold" and AVT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 5.1% upside for SCSC (target: $43) vs -5.2% for AVT (target: $79). AVT is the only dividend payer here at 1.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.00 | $79.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +12.0% | +4.4% |
SCSC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AVT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
SCSC vs AVT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCSC or AVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) is the stronger pick with -6. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCSC or AVT?
On trailing P/E, ScanSource, Inc.
(SCSC) is the cheapest at 13. 6x versus Avnet, Inc. at 30. 4x. On forward P/E, ScanSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCSC or AVT?
Over the past 5 years, Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) delivered a total return of +106. 2%, compared to +29. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVT returned +137. 5% versus SCSC's +2. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCSC or AVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus ScanSource, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning SCSC is approximately 16% more volatile than AVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 57% for Avnet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SCSC or AVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) is pulling ahead at -6. 6% versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ScanSource, Inc. grew EPS -2. 0% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Avnet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVT leads at -3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCSC or AVT?
ScanSource, Inc.
(SCSC) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 4% net margin versus 1. 1% for Avnet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVT leads at 2. 8% versus 2. 8% for SCSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCSC leads at 13. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SCSC or AVT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ScanSource, Inc.
(SCSC) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 16. 8x for Avnet, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SCSC: 5. 1% to $43. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SCSC or AVT?
In this comparison, AVT (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. SCSC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SCSC or AVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27), 1. 5% yield, +137. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AVT: +137. 5%, SCSC: +2. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SCSC and AVT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SCSC is a small-cap deep-value stock; AVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AVT pays a dividend while SCSC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.