SFL vs TK

For growth investors, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the stronger pick with -16.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL). Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (61. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Corporation (TK) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Teekay Corporation is actually cheaper at 61.

9x.

Over the past 5 years, Teekay Corporation (TK) delivered a total return of +422.

5%, compared to +104. 0% for SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TK returned +87. 8% versus SFL's +55. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teekay Corporation (TK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

38β versus SFL Corporation Ltd. 's 0. 67β — meaning SFL is approximately 77% more volatile than TK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Corporation (TK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for SFL Corporation Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teekay Corporation (TK) is pulling ahead at -16.

7% versus -19. 3% for SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Corporation grew EPS -7. 8% year-over-year, compared to -119. 8% for SFL Corporation Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TK leads at 21. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Teekay Corporation (TK) is the more profitable company, earning 11.

0% net margin versus -3. 7% for SFL Corporation Ltd. — meaning it keeps 11. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TK leads at 29. 9% versus 19. 0% for SFL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SFL leads at 58. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Teekay Corporation (TK) trades at 61.

9x forward P/E versus 347. 5x for SFL Corporation Ltd. — 285. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) offers the highest yield at 8. 0%, versus 6. 7% for Teekay Corporation (TK).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

38), 6. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TK: +87. 8%, SFL: +55. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (SFL (Industrials) and TK (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SFL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TK is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.