SII
Sprott Inc.
Asset Management
Market Cap$3.06B
5Y Perf.+229.1%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisSII
VRTS
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SII vs VRTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
Asset Management
Market Cap$972M
5Y Perf.+24.8%
SII vs VRTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  SII |  VRTS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $3.06B | $972M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $386M | $831M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $84M | $138M |
| Gross Margin | 83.4% | 74.9% |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | 17.4% |
| Forward P/E | 25.3x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.84B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $118M | $477M |
SII vs VRTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SII
VRTS
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sprott Inc. (SII) | 100 | 329.1 | +229.1% |
| Virtus Investment P… (VRTS) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SII vs VRTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: VRTS leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Sprott Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇VRTS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
SII
Sprott Inc.
The Banking Pick
SII is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 75.2%, EPS growth 38.7%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs VRTS's 156.5%
- NIM 1.1% vs VRTS's 0.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
The Banking Pick
VRTS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 6.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, current ratio 3.80x
- PEG 0.40 vs SII's 1.32
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  SII | 75.2% NII/revenue growth vs VRTS's -8.0% |
| Value |  VRTS | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.40 vs 1.32 |
| Quality / Margins | VRTS | Efficiency ratio 0.6% vs SII's 0.6% (lower = leaner) |
| Stability / Safety | VRTS | Beta 1.12 vs SII's 1.51 |
| Dividends | VRTS | 6.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs SII's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SII | +89.8% vs VRTS's -12.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | VRTS | Efficiency ratio 0.6% vs SII's 0.6% |
SII vs VRTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
SII vs VRTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSIILAGGINGVRTS
VRTSVirtus Investment Par…
2leads
SIISprott Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs VRTSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SII5/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
VRTS6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SII8/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SII6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
VRTS2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SII leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRTS is the larger business by revenue, generating $831M annually — 2.2x SII's $386M. SII is the more profitable business, keeping 21.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VRTS's 16.7%.
| Metric | SIISprott Inc. | VRTSVirtus Investment… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $386M | $831M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $121M | $205M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $84M | $138M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $126M | -$67M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.4% | +74.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +17.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | -8.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +143.5% | +10.9% |
SII leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
VRTS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.3x trailing earnings, VRTS trades at a 84% valuation discount to SII's 44.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VRTS offers better value at 0.49x vs SII's 2.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | SIISprott Inc. | VRTSVirtus Investment… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $972M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.83x | 7.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.29x | 5.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.33x | 0.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.48x | 16.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.39x | 1.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.35x | 0.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.96x | — |
VRTS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SII leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SII delivers a 23.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $14 for VRTS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SII scores 7/9 vs VRTS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | SIISprott Inc. | VRTSVirtus Investment… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.5% | +13.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.5% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.1% | +3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.8% | +3.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$118M | $2.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $118M | $477M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 94.69x | 2.15x |
SII leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SII leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SII five years ago would be worth $29,214 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,288 for VRTS. Over the past 12 months, SII leads with a +89.8% total return vs VRTS's -12.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SII at 54.8% vs VRTS's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SIISprott Inc. | VRTSVirtus Investment… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.1% | -7.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +89.8% | -12.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +271.1% | -19.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.1% | -37.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +555.3% | +156.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +54.8% | -7.1% |
SII leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SII and VRTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRTS is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SII's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | SIISprott Inc. | VRTSVirtus Investment… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $169.63 | $215.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.94 | $121.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.0% | +67.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.0 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 174K | 98K |
Evenly matched — SII and VRTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
VRTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SII as "Buy" and VRTS as "Hold". For income investors, VRTS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.42% vs SII's 1.09%.
| Metric | SIISprott Inc. | VRTSVirtus Investment… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $135.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +6.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.30 | $9.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +6.2% |
VRTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
SII leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VRTS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Best OverallSprott Inc. (SII)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SII vs VRTS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SII or VRTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sprott Inc.
(SII) is the stronger pick with 75. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sprott Inc. (SII) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SII or VRTS?
On trailing P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
(VRTS) is the cheapest at 7. 3x versus Sprott Inc. at 44. 8x. On forward P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. wins at 0. 40x versus Sprott Inc. 's 1. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SII or VRTS?
Over the past 5 years, Sprott Inc.
(SII) delivered a total return of +192. 1%, compared to -37. 1% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SII returned +555. 3% versus VRTS's +156. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SII or VRTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
(VRTS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Sprott Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning SII is approximately 34% more volatile than VRTS relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SII or VRTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sprott Inc.
(SII) is pulling ahead at 75. 2% versus -8. 0% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sprott Inc. grew EPS 38. 7% year-over-year, compared to 18. 2% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SII or VRTS?
Sprott Inc.
(SII) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 2% net margin versus 16. 7% for Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SII leads at 33. 0% versus 17. 4% for VRTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SII leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SII or VRTS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Sprott Inc. 's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for Sprott Inc. — 19. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SII or VRTS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the highest yield at 6. 4%, versus 1. 1% for Sprott Inc. (SII).
09Is SII or VRTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
(VRTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), 6. 4% yield, +156. 5% 10Y return). Sprott Inc. (SII) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRTS: +156. 5%, SII: +555. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SII and VRTS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SII is a small-cap high-growth stock; VRTS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.