Agricultural Inputs
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SMG vs SPB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Household & Personal Products
SMG vs SPB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Inputs | Household & Personal Products |
| Market Cap | $3.65B | $1.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.35B | $2.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $90M | $105M |
| Gross Margin | 31.0% | 36.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 14.3x | 16.1x |
| Total Debt | $2.38B | $654M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $124M |
SMG vs SPB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Scotts Miracle-… (SMG) | 100 | 44.1 | -55.9% |
| Spectrum Brands Hol… (SPB) | 100 | 179.7 | +79.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMG vs SPB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -3.9%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.5%
- 34.9% 10Y total return vs SPB's 13.5%
- -3.9% revenue growth vs SPB's -5.2%
SPB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 34.3%, current ratio 2.26x
- Beta 0.82, yield 2.2%, current ratio 2.26x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.9% revenue growth vs SPB's -5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.3x vs 16.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs SMG's 2.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs SMG's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs SPB's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.8% vs SMG's +19.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs SMG's 2.9%, ROIC 3.9% vs 13.3% |
SMG vs SPB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMG vs SPB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMG and SPB operate at a comparable scale, with $3.4B and $2.8B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.8% (SPB) to 2.7% (SMG). On growth, SPB holds the edge at -3.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $466M | $214M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $90M | $105M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $358M | $303M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | +36.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.0% | -3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -78.5% | +48.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SPB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.0x trailing earnings, SPB trades at a 13% valuation discount to SMG's 25.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SPB's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SMG's 13.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.45x | 22.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.34x | 16.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.82x | 11.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.07x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.32x | 11.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMG scores 7/9 vs SPB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.3% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.4% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | $531M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $654M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.08x | 3.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPB five years ago would be worth $10,236 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,161 for SMG. Over the past 12 months, SPB leads with a +37.8% total return vs SMG's +19.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPB at 7.1% vs SMG's -0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.9% | +42.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.3% | +37.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.5% | +23.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.4% | +2.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.9% | +13.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.8% | +7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SPB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMG's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPB currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs SMG's 86.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $72.35 | $86.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $52.00 | $49.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.9% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 55.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 948K | 313K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SMG and SPB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SMG as "Buy" and SPB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.6% upside for SMG (target: $72) vs -0.0% for SPB (target: $85). For income investors, SMG offers the higher dividend yield at 4.18% vs SPB's 2.19%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $72.00 | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.63 | $1.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +16.5% |
SPB leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
SMG vs SPB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMG or SPB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) is the stronger pick with -3.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB). Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB) offers the better valuation at 22. 0x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMG or SPB?
On trailing P/E, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.
(SPB) is the cheapest at 22. 0x versus The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company at 25. 4x. On forward P/E, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMG or SPB?
Over the past 5 years, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.
(SPB) delivered a total return of +2. 4%, compared to -68. 4% for The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMG returned +34. 9% versus SPB's +13. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMG or SPB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.
(SPB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company's 1. 10β — meaning SMG is approximately 35% more volatile than SPB relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SMG or SPB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) is pulling ahead at -3.
9% versus -5. 2% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company grew EPS 504. 9% year-over-year, compared to -5. 6% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPB leads at -3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMG or SPB?
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMG leads at 10. 5% versus 4. 4% for SPB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPB leads at 36. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMG or SPB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) trades at 14.
3x forward P/E versus 16. 1x for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMG: 14. 6% to $72. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMG or SPB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 2. 2% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB).
09Is SMG or SPB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.
(SPB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 2. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPB: +13. 5%, SMG: +34. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMG and SPB?
These companies operate in different sectors (SMG (Basic Materials) and SPB (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SMG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SPB is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.