Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SNDK vs WDC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
SNDK vs WDC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Computer Hardware |
| Market Cap | $208.11B | $163.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.59B | $11.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.64B | $6.49B |
| Gross Margin | 55.8% | 45.4% |
| Operating Margin | 40.9% | 30.8% |
| Forward P/E | 30.9x | 53.6x |
| Total Debt | $2.04B | $5.08B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.48B | $2.11B |
SNDK vs WDC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) | 100 | 3009.6 | +2909.6% |
| Western Digital Cor… (WDC) | 100 | 987.4 | +887.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNDK vs WDC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNDK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 89.0%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.0%
- 38.2% 10Y total return vs WDC's 16.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.43, Low D/E 22.2%, current ratio 3.56x
WDC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.30, yield 0.0%
- Beta 2.30, yield 0.0%, current ratio 1.08x
- 55.1% margin vs SNDK's 34.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 89.0% revenue growth vs WDC's 50.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.9x vs 53.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.1% margin vs SNDK's 34.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.30 vs SNDK's 3.43 | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.7% vs WDC's +9.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 44.0% ROA vs SNDK's 33.4%, ROIC 13.8% vs -10.6% |
SNDK vs WDC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SNDK vs WDC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNDK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNDK and WDC operate at a comparable scale, with $13.6B and $11.8B in trailing revenue. WDC is the more profitable business, keeping 55.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNDK's 34.2%. On growth, SNDK holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.6B | $11.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.7B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.6B | $6.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.8B | $2.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.8% | +45.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +40.9% | +30.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +55.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.7% | +24.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +45.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +5.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SNDK leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $208.1B | $163.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $208.7B | $166.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -124.56x | 94.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.85x | 53.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 59.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 28.30x | 17.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 22.18x | 32.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 127.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SNDK and WDC each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WDC delivers a 91.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $92 in annual profit, vs $43 for SNDK. SNDK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WDC's 0.96x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +43.4% | +91.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +33.4% | +44.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.6% | +13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.9% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $561M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $5.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 45.06x | 26.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNDK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNDK five years ago would be worth $391,661 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $91,939 for WDC. Over the past 12 months, SNDK leads with a +4067.8% total return vs WDC's +991.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNDK at 2.4% vs WDC's 165.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +412.3% | +157.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4067.8% | +991.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3816.6% | +1772.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3816.6% | +819.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3816.6% | +1638.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.4% | +165.5% |
Risk & Volatility
WDC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WDC is the less volatile stock with a 2.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNDK's 3.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.43x | 2.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1439.70 | $483.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.13 | $43.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 81.1 | 81.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16.6M | 8.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SNDK as "Buy" and WDC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -15.3% upside for SNDK (target: $1194) vs -15.6% for WDC (target: $408).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1194.33 | $407.54 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
SNDK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WDC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
SNDK vs WDC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNDK or WDC a better buy right now?
Western Digital Corporation (WDC) offers the better valuation at 94.
4x trailing P/E (53. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNDK or WDC?
On forward P/E, Sandisk Corporation is actually cheaper at 30.
9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNDK or WDC?
Over the past 5 years, Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) delivered a total return of +38.
2%, compared to +819. 4% for Western Digital Corporation (WDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNDK returned +38. 2% versus WDC's +1639%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNDK or WDC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Western Digital Corporation (WDC) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
30β versus Sandisk Corporation's 3. 43β — meaning SNDK is approximately 49% more volatile than WDC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 96% for Western Digital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNDK or WDC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Western Digital Corporation grew EPS 296.
2% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Sandisk Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNDK leads at -9. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNDK or WDC?
Western Digital Corporation (WDC) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
5% net margin versus -22. 3% for Sandisk Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WDC leads at 24. 5% versus -18. 7% for SNDK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WDC leads at 38. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNDK or WDC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) trades at 30.
9x forward P/E versus 53. 6x for Western Digital Corporation — 22. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNDK: -15. 3% to $1194. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNDK or WDC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SNDK or WDC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Western Digital Corporation (WDC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1639% 10Y return).
Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) carries a higher beta of 3. 43 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WDC: +1639%, SNDK: +38. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNDK and WDC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SNDK is a large-cap quality compounder stock; WDC is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.