Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SONM vs NTGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
SONM vs NTGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $24M | $708M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $59M | $690M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-33M | $-40M |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | 37.5% |
| Operating Margin | -54.4% | -4.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 129.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $51M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $210M |
SONM vs NTGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sonim Technologies,… (SONM) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR) | 100 | 100.6 | +0.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SONM vs NTGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SONM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.36
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, current ratio 0.74x
- Beta 1.36, current ratio 0.74x
NTGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.9%, EPS growth -371.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.4%
- -37.7% 10Y total return vs SONM's -100.0%
- 2.9% revenue growth vs SONM's -37.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.9% revenue growth vs SONM's -37.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | -5.8% margin vs SONM's -56.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.36 vs NTGR's 1.39 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -9.7% vs SONM's -79.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -4.9% ROA vs SONM's -83.0%, ROIC -8.4% vs -25.4% |
SONM vs NTGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SONM vs NTGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTGR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $690M annually — 11.7x SONM's $59M. NTGR is the more profitable business, keeping -5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SONM's -56.5%. On growth, SONM holds the edge at +7.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $59M | $690M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | -$19M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33M | -$40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$26M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +37.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -54.4% | -4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -56.5% | -5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -44.1% | -1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.3% | -123.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SONM and NTGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $708M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $549M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.71x | -22.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 129.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 1.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTGR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTGR delivers a -8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-8 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SONM. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTGR scores 5/9 vs SONM's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.0% | -8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -83.0% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -25.4% | -8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.4% | -6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$159M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $51M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -31.62x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTGR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTGR five years ago would be worth $6,704 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $44 for SONM. Over the past 12 months, NTGR leads with a -9.7% total return vs SONM's -79.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTGR at 23.1% vs SONM's -68.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +74.7% | +6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -79.6% | -9.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.0% | +86.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -33.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -37.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -68.9% | +23.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SONM and NTGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SONM is the less volatile stock with a 1.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTGR's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTGR currently trades 70.2% from its 52-week high vs SONM's 13.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.52 | $36.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.52 | $19.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.1% | +70.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.8 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 46K | 515K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.2% |
NTGR leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
SONM vs NTGR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SONM or NTGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETGEAR, Inc.
(NTGR) is the stronger pick with 2. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 7% for Sonim Technologies, Inc. (SONM). Analysts rate NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR) a "Hold" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SONM or NTGR?
Over the past 5 years, NETGEAR, Inc.
(NTGR) delivered a total return of -33. 0%, compared to -99. 6% for Sonim Technologies, Inc. (SONM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTGR returned -37. 7% versus SONM's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SONM or NTGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sonim Technologies, Inc.
(SONM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus NETGEAR, Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning NTGR is approximately 2% more volatile than SONM relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SONM or NTGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETGEAR, Inc.
(NTGR) is pulling ahead at 2. 9% versus -37. 7% for Sonim Technologies, Inc. (SONM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETGEAR, Inc. grew EPS -371. 4% year-over-year, compared to -338. 5% for Sonim Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SONM leads at 2. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SONM or NTGR?
NETGEAR, Inc.
(NTGR) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 7% net margin versus -57. 7% for Sonim Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTGR leads at -5. 1% versus -57. 7% for SONM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTGR leads at 36. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SONM or NTGR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SONM or NTGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NETGEAR, Inc.
(NTGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTGR: -37. 7%, SONM: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SONM and NTGR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.