SPPL
SIMPPLE Ltd. Ordinary Shares
Software - Application
Market Cap$44M
5Y Perf.-93.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SPPL vs FMST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FMST
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
Chemicals
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-54.1%
SPPL vs FMST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SPPL | FMST |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Chemicals |
| Market Cap | $44M | $25M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-3M |
| Gross Margin | 59.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -117.2% | — |
| Total Debt | $620K | $521K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $515K | $5M |
SPPL vs FMST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SPPL
FMST
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIMPPLE Ltd. Ordina… (SPPL) | 100 | 6.8 | -93.2% |
| Foremost Clean Ener… (FMST) | 100 | 45.9 | -54.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPPL vs FMST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FMST leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. SIMPPLE Ltd. Ordinary Shares is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SPPL
SIMPPLE Ltd. Ordinary Shares
The Income Pick
SPPL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.05
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 25.3%, current ratio 0.88x
- Beta 0.05, current ratio 0.88x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
FMST
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
The Growth Play
FMST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 51.5%
- -71.7% 10Y total return vs SPPL's -93.2%
- 85.1% revenue growth vs SPPL's -19.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FMST | 85.1% revenue growth vs SPPL's -19.5% |
| Quality / Margins | FMST | -1.0% margin vs SPPL's -104.2% |
| Stability / Safety | SPPL | Beta 0.05 vs FMST's 3.51 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FMST | +71.7% vs SPPL's -14.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FMST | -9.8% ROA vs SPPL's -51.1%, ROIC -26.2% vs -104.0% |
SPPL vs FMST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
SPPL vs FMST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFMSTLAGGINGSPPL
SPPLSIMPPLE Ltd. Ordinary…
1leads
FMSTForemost Clean Energy…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SPPLMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
—
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FMST8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FMST6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SPPL2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPPL and FMST operate at a comparable scale, with $4M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | SPPLSIMPPLE Ltd. Ordi… | FMSTForemost Clean En… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.9% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -117.2% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -104.2% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -68.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +25.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SPPL and FMST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SPPLSIMPPLE Ltd. Ordi… | FMSTForemost Clean En… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44M | $25M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44M | $22M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.15x | -4.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.82x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 22.86x | 0.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — SPPL and FMST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FMST leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FMST delivers a -10.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-11 in annual profit, vs $-131 for SPPL. FMST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPPL's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPPL scores 6/9 vs FMST's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SPPLSIMPPLE Ltd. Ordi… | FMSTForemost Clean En… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -131.3% | -10.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -51.1% | -9.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -104.0% | -26.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -133.5% | -30.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $104,791 | -$4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $514,825 | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $619,616 | $521,368 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -126.91x | -71.80x |
FMST leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FMST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FMST five years ago would be worth $2,829 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $681 for SPPL. Over the past 12 months, FMST leads with a +71.7% total return vs SPPL's -14.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FMST at -34.4% vs SPPL's -59.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SPPLSIMPPLE Ltd. Ordi… | FMSTForemost Clean En… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.4% | -25.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.7% | +71.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.2% | -71.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.2% | -71.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.2% | -71.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.2% | -34.4% |
FMST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FMST's 3.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPPL currently trades 38.1% from its 52-week high vs FMST's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SPPLSIMPPLE Ltd. Ordi… | FMSTForemost Clean En… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | 3.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.00 | $5.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.50 | $0.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.1% | +29.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.3 | 46.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 554K | 138K |
SPPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | SPPLSIMPPLE Ltd. Ordi… | FMSTForemost Clean En… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
FMST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SPPL leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Best OverallForemost Clean Energy Ltd. (FMST)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SPPL vs FMST: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — SPPL or FMST?
Over the past 5 years, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
(FMST) delivered a total return of -71. 7%, compared to -93. 2% for SIMPPLE Ltd. Ordinary Shares (SPPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FMST returned -71. 7% versus SPPL's -93. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — SPPL or FMST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SIMPPLE Ltd.
Ordinary Shares (SPPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. 's 3. 51β — meaning FMST is approximately 7580% more volatile than SPPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. (FMST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 25% for SIMPPLE Ltd. Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which is growing faster — SPPL or FMST?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
grew EPS 51. 5% year-over-year, compared to 47. 8% for SIMPPLE Ltd. Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — SPPL or FMST?
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.
(FMST) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -104. 2% for SIMPPLE Ltd. Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FMST leads at 0. 0% versus -117. 2% for SPPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPPL leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — SPPL or FMST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is SPPL or FMST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SIMPPLE Ltd.
Ordinary Shares (SPPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05)). Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. (FMST) carries a higher beta of 3. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPPL: -93. 2%, FMST: -71. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between SPPL and FMST?
These companies operate in different sectors (SPPL (Technology) and FMST (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.