SQFT
Presidio Property Trust, Inc.
REIT - Diversified
Market Cap$44M
5Y Perf.-91.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SQFT vs GOOD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GOOD
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
REIT - Diversified
Market Cap$616M
5Y Perf.-21.7%
SQFT vs GOOD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SQFT | GOOD |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $44M | $616M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $166M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $21M |
| Gross Margin | 64.6% | -11.7% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 27.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 83.0x |
| Total Debt | $102M | $856M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $11M |
SQFT vs GOOD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SQFT
GOOD
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presidio Property T… (SQFT) | 100 | 9.0 | -91.0% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 78.3 | -21.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SQFT vs GOOD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GOOD leads in 6 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SQFT
Presidio Property Trust, Inc.
The REIT Holding
In this particular matchup, SQFT is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: real estate exposure
GOOD
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
The Real Estate Income Play
GOOD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 11.4%
- Rev growth 8.0%, EPS growth 57.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.7%
- 51.0% 10Y total return vs SQFT's -74.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GOOD | 8.0% FFO/revenue growth vs SQFT's 7.3% |
| Quality / Margins | GOOD | 12.7% margin vs SQFT's -38.7% |
| Stability / Safety | GOOD | Beta 0.55 vs SQFT's 0.87, lower leverage |
| Dividends | GOOD | 11.4% yield, vs SQFT's 5.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | GOOD | +0.7% vs SQFT's -40.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GOOD | 1.7% ROA vs SQFT's -5.3%, ROIC 4.4% vs -0.2% |
SQFT vs GOOD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
SQFT vs GOOD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGOODLAGGINGSQFT
SQFTPresidio Property Tru…
1leads
GOODGladstone Commercial …
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SQFTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GOOD5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SQFT3/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GOOD6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GOOD6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GOOD2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOD is the larger business by revenue, generating $166M annually — 9.5x SQFT's $18M. GOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SQFT's -38.7%. On growth, GOOD holds the edge at +11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SQFTPresidio Property… | GOODGladstone Commerc… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $166M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $106M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$67,454 | $90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.6% | -11.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +27.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -38.7% | +12.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | +54.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.2% | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -188.7% | +2.8% |
GOOD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SQFT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GOOD's 12.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SQFT's 26.8x.
| Metric | SQFTPresidio Property… | GOODGladstone Commerc… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44M | $616M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $138M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.56x | 31.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 82.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.88x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.78x | 12.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 3.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.25x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.17x |
SQFT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-23 for SQFT. GOOD carries lower financial leverage with a 2.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SQFT's 2.92x.
| Metric | SQFTPresidio Property… | GOODGladstone Commerc… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.1% | +9.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.92x | 2.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $94M | $846M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $856M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.06x | 1.46x |
GOOD leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOD five years ago would be worth $9,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,870 for SQFT. Over the past 12 months, GOOD leads with a +0.7% total return vs SQFT's -40.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOD at 12.9% vs SQFT's -21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SQFTPresidio Property… | GOODGladstone Commerc… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.1% | +21.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.7% | +0.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.2% | +43.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.3% | -9.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.3% | +51.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.8% | +12.9% |
GOOD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOD is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SQFT's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOD currently trades 84.6% from its 52-week high vs SQFT's 15.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SQFTPresidio Property… | GOODGladstone Commerc… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.00 | $15.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.10 | $10.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.3% | +84.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 49.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 390K |
GOOD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SQFT and GOOD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, GOOD offers the higher dividend yield at 11.35% vs SQFT's 5.13%.
| Metric | SQFTPresidio Property… | GOODGladstone Commerc… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.1% | +11.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.18 | $1.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.7% |
Evenly matched — SQFT and GOOD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
GOOD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SQFT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallGladstone Commercial Corpor… (GOOD)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SQFT vs GOOD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SQFT or GOOD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the stronger pick with 8.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 3% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. (SQFT). Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the better valuation at 31. 0x trailing P/E (83. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SQFT or GOOD?
Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) delivered a total return of -9.
7%, compared to -71. 3% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. (SQFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOD returned +51. 0% versus SQFT's -74. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SQFT or GOOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus Presidio Property Trust, Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning SQFT is approximately 57% more volatile than GOOD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SQFT or GOOD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is pulling ahead at 8.
0% versus 7. 3% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. (SQFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gladstone Commercial Corporation grew EPS 57. 7% year-over-year, compared to -430. 9% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOD leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SQFT or GOOD?
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
0% net margin versus -135. 4% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOD leads at 37. 2% versus -2. 0% for SQFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SQFT leads at 66. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SQFT or GOOD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the highest yield at 11. 4%, versus 5. 1% for Presidio Property Trust, Inc. (SQFT).
07Is SQFT or GOOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 11. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOD: +51. 0%, SQFT: -74. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SQFT and GOOD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SQFT: -11.2% · GOOD: 11.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.