SQM vs LAC

Analysts rate Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.

A. (SQM) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.

A. (SQM) delivered a total return of +104. 5%, compared to -21. 5% for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SQM returned +442. 5% versus LAC's +256. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.

A. (SQM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 24β versus Lithium Americas Corp. 's 1. 42β — meaning LAC is approximately 15% more volatile than SQM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 93% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.

A. grew EPS -120. 1% year-over-year, compared to -757. 1% for Lithium Americas Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Lithium Americas Corp.

(LAC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -8. 9% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SQM leads at 23. 5% versus 0. 0% for LAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SQM leads at 29. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LAC: 16.

9% to $7. 00.

In this comparison, SQM (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. LAC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.

A. (SQM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 24), +442. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SQM: +442. 5%, LAC: +256. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.