REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SRG vs SKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
SRG vs SKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $151M | $4.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $582M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-74M | $115M |
| Gross Margin | 9.9% | 55.9% |
| Operating Margin | -205.1% | 19.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 35.0x |
| Total Debt | $240M | $1.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $18M |
SRG vs SKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seritage Growth Pro… (SRG) | 100 | 34.1 | -65.9% |
| Tanger Inc. (SKT) | 100 | 599.2 | +499.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SRG vs SKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SRG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 59.1%, current ratio 3.30x
- Beta 1.01, yield 3.3%, current ratio 3.30x
- 3.3% yield, vs SKT's 3.1%
SKT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.1%
- Rev growth 10.5%, EPS growth 13.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- 31.8% 10Y total return vs SRG's -89.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% FFO/revenue growth vs SRG's -15.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.7% margin vs SRG's -404.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs SRG's 1.01 | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, vs SKT's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.2% vs SRG's -7.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs SRG's -12.1%, ROIC 5.8% vs -5.1% |
SRG vs SKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SRG vs SKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $582M annually — 31.6x SRG's $18M. SKT is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SRG's -4.0%. On growth, SRG holds the edge at +47.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $582M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$30M | $264M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$74M | $115M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$48M | $212M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +55.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +19.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +19.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +36.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.2% | +13.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.5% | +26.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SRG leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $151M | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $306M | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.95x | 36.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 35.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.57x | 7.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.37x | 5.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SKT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SKT delivers a 16.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-20 for SRG. SRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKT's 2.30x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.1% | +16.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.1% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | +5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.8% | +7.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 2.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $155M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $240M | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.83x | 2.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SKT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SKT five years ago would be worth $24,881 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,663 for SRG. Over the past 12 months, SKT leads with a +28.2% total return vs SRG's -7.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKT at 28.2% vs SRG's -29.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.2% | +13.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.6% | +28.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.9% | +110.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.4% | +148.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | +31.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.4% | +28.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SKT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SKT is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SRG's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SKT currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs SRG's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.56 | $37.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.43 | $28.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.8% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 50.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 221K | 754K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SRG and SKT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SRG as "Hold" and SKT as "Hold". For income investors, SRG offers the higher dividend yield at 3.25% vs SKT's 3.13%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $35.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
SKT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SRG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SRG vs SKT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SRG or SKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tanger Inc.
(SKT) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Seritage Growth Properties (SRG). Tanger Inc. (SKT) offers the better valuation at 36. 9x trailing P/E (35. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seritage Growth Properties (SRG) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SRG or SKT?
Over the past 5 years, Tanger Inc.
(SKT) delivered a total return of +148. 8%, compared to -83. 4% for Seritage Growth Properties (SRG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKT returned +31. 8% versus SRG's -89. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SRG or SKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tanger Inc.
(SKT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Seritage Growth Properties's 1. 01β — meaning SRG is approximately 56% more volatile than SKT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Seritage Growth Properties (SRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 2% for Tanger Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SRG or SKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tanger Inc.
(SKT) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus -15. 2% for Seritage Growth Properties (SRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tanger Inc. grew EPS 13. 6% year-over-year, compared to 1. 1% for Seritage Growth Properties. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKT leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SRG or SKT?
Tanger Inc.
(SKT) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 7% net margin versus -871. 3% for Seritage Growth Properties — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SKT leads at 30. 2% versus -259. 9% for SRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKT leads at 17. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SRG or SKT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Seritage Growth Properties (SRG) offers the highest yield at 3. 3%, versus 3. 1% for Tanger Inc. (SKT).
07Is SRG or SKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tanger Inc.
(SKT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SKT: +31. 8%, SRG: -89. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SRG and SKT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.