STIM vs ELMD

For growth investors, Neuronetics, Inc.

(STIM) is the stronger pick with 99. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 0% for Electromed, Inc. (ELMD). Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) offers the better valuation at 31. 3x trailing P/E (24. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Neuronetics, Inc. (STIM) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Electromed, Inc.

(ELMD) delivered a total return of +168. 5%, compared to -87. 3% for Neuronetics, Inc. (STIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ELMD returned +484. 2% versus STIM's -94. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Electromed, Inc.

(ELMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Neuronetics, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning STIM is approximately 75% more volatile than ELMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Neuronetics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Neuronetics, Inc.

(STIM) is pulling ahead at 99. 2% versus 17. 0% for Electromed, Inc. (ELMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Neuronetics, Inc. grew EPS 57. 2% year-over-year, compared to 48. 3% for Electromed, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STIM leads at 31. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Electromed, Inc.

(ELMD) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus -26. 1% for Neuronetics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ELMD leads at 15. 1% versus -21. 1% for STIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ELMD leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STIM: 383.

4% to $8. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Electromed, Inc.

(ELMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), +484. 2% 10Y return). Neuronetics, Inc. (STIM) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ELMD: +484. 2%, STIM: -94. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.