Restaurants
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STKS vs BLMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
STKS vs BLMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $60M | $678M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $806M | $3.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-92M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 14.6% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 1.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $651M | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $59M |
STKS vs BLMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The ONE Group Hospi… (STKS) | 100 | 109.0 | +9.0% |
| Bloomin' Brands, In… (BLMN) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STKS vs BLMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STKS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.50
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth -261.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.5%
- -22.7% 10Y total return vs BLMN's -36.8%
BLMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 0.5% margin vs STKS's -11.4%
- 5.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +13.6% vs STKS's -38.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs BLMN's 0.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.5% margin vs STKS's -11.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.50 vs BLMN's 1.82, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.6% vs STKS's -38.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.7% ROA vs STKS's -10.1%, ROIC 4.3% vs 4.2% |
STKS vs BLMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STKS vs BLMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLMN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 4.9x STKS's $806M. BLMN is the more profitable business, keeping 0.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STKS's -11.4%. On growth, BLMN holds the edge at +1.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $806M | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$92M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$27M | $119M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | +0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +3.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.7% | +1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -172.2% | +30.0% |
Valuation Metrics
STKS leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, STKS's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BLMN's 10.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $60M | $678M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $707M | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.47x | 125.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.13x | 10.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 0.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.53x | 2.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BLMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BLMN delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-59 for STKS. STKS carries lower financial leverage with a 5.84x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLMN's 9.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLMN scores 6/9 vs STKS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -59.0% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.1% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.84x | 9.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $647M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $59M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $651M | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.64x | 1.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BLMN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLMN five years ago would be worth $3,597 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,983 for STKS. Over the past 12 months, BLMN leads with a +13.6% total return vs STKS's -38.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BLMN at -24.5% vs STKS's -34.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.8% | +24.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.8% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.9% | -56.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.2% | -64.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.7% | -36.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.5% | -24.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STKS and BLMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLMN's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BLMN currently trades 74.3% from its 52-week high vs STKS's 36.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.50x | 2.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.26 | $10.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.65 | $5.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.3% | +74.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.1 | 73.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 44K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
BLMN is the only dividend payer here at 5.65% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | 0.0% |
BLMN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
STKS vs BLMN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STKS or BLMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.
(STKS) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN). Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) offers the better valuation at 126. 0x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) a "Hold" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — STKS or BLMN?
Over the past 5 years, Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
(BLMN) delivered a total return of -64. 0%, compared to -80. 2% for The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. (STKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STKS returned -19. 0% versus BLMN's -35. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — STKS or BLMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.
(STKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 50β versus Bloomin' Brands, Inc. 's 2. 20β — meaning BLMN is approximately 47% more volatile than STKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. (STKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 9% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — STKS or BLMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.
(STKS) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 0. 1% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bloomin' Brands, Inc. grew EPS 104. 2% year-over-year, compared to -261. 6% for The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STKS leads at 36. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — STKS or BLMN?
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
(BLMN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -11. 4% for The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STKS leads at 5. 4% versus 4. 1% for BLMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STKS leads at 11. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — STKS or BLMN?
In this comparison, BLMN (5.
6% yield) pays a dividend. STKS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is STKS or BLMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
(BLMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (5. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BLMN: -35. 9%, STKS: -19. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between STKS and BLMN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STKS is a small-cap high-growth stock; BLMN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. BLMN pays a dividend while STKS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.