Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
SUPN vs PCRX vs ACAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
SUPN vs PCRX vs ACAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.82B | $975M | $3.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $777M | $735M | $1.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-29M | $9M | $261M |
| Gross Margin | 85.6% | 60.2% | 91.9% |
| Operating Margin | -5.5% | 3.4% | 23.0% |
| Forward P/E | 22.6x | 9.0x | 50.4x |
| Total Debt | $41M | $454M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $159M | $320M |
SUPN vs PCRX vs ACAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supernus Pharmaceut… (SUPN) | 100 | 203.3 | +103.3% |
| Pacira BioSciences,… (PCRX) | 100 | 56.4 | -43.6% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.0 | -55.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SUPN vs PCRX vs ACAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SUPN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 213.7% 10Y total return vs ACAD's -17.4%
- +51.4% vs PCRX's -4.0%
PCRX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.47
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 65.6%, current ratio 4.54x
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 4.54x
ACAD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 31.8%, EPS growth 467.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.5%
- 31.8% revenue growth vs PCRX's 3.6%
- 24.9% margin vs SUPN's -3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.8% revenue growth vs PCRX's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 50.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.9% margin vs SUPN's -3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs ACAD's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.4% vs PCRX's -4.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.6% ROA vs SUPN's -2.0%, ROIC 45.2% vs -2.8% |
SUPN vs PCRX vs ACAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SUPN vs PCRX vs ACAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD and PCRX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.0B and $735M in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 24.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUPN's -3.7%. On growth, SUPN holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $777M | $735M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $92M | $95M | $255M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$29M | $9M | $261M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $82M | $133M | $198M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.6% | +60.2% | +91.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +3.4% | +23.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +1.3% | +24.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +18.1% | +18.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.6% | +5.0% | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.0% | -30.0% | +110.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PCRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.4x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 89% valuation discount to PCRX's 154.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PCRX's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SUPN's 51.5x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $975M | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $1.3B | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -72.10x | 154.94x | 16.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.62x | 9.03x | 50.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 51.45x | 10.22x | 14.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.93x | 1.34x | 3.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.61x | 1.61x | 5.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 61.38x | 7.14x | 24.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 28.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SUPN. SUPN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PCRX's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCRX scores 9/9 vs ACAD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +1.3% | +28.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.0% | +0.7% | +19.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.8% | +2.3% | +45.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.4% | +2.8% | +35.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 9 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.66x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$87M | $296M | -$268M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $159M | $320M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $41M | $454M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.37x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SUPN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SUPN five years ago would be worth $16,081 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,002 for PCRX. Over the past 12 months, SUPN leads with a +51.4% total return vs PCRX's -4.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SUPN at 10.1% vs PCRX's -16.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.9% | +1.3% | -14.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +51.4% | -4.0% | +47.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.6% | -42.2% | +1.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.8% | -60.0% | +15.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +213.7% | -48.2% | -17.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.1% | -16.7% | +0.6% |
Risk & Volatility
PCRX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACAD's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PCRX currently trades 89.7% from its 52-week high vs ACAD's 80.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 0.47x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.68 | $27.64 | $27.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.16 | $18.80 | $14.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.2% | +89.7% | +80.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.1 | 54.2 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 650K | 697K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SUPN as "Buy", PCRX as "Hold", ACAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.6% upside for ACAD (target: $35) vs 19.0% for PCRX (target: $30).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $60.00 | $29.50 | $34.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 36 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +15.2% | 0.0% |
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PCRX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
SUPN vs PCRX vs ACAD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SUPN or PCRX or ACAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the stronger pick with 31. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E (50. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SUPN) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SUPN or PCRX or ACAD?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 16. 4x versus Pacira BioSciences, Inc. at 154. 9x. On forward P/E, Pacira BioSciences, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SUPN or PCRX or ACAD?
Over the past 5 years, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) delivered a total return of +60. 8%, compared to -60. 0% for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SUPN returned +213. 7% versus PCRX's -48. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SUPN or PCRX or ACAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
(PCRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning ACAD is approximately 168% more volatile than PCRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SUPN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 66% for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SUPN or PCRX or ACAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is pulling ahead at 31. 8% versus 3. 6% for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 467. 6% year-over-year, compared to -151. 5% for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 25. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SUPN or PCRX or ACAD?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 6% net margin versus -5. 4% for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 24. 1% versus -5. 1% for SUPN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SUPN or PCRX or ACAD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
(PCRX) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 50. 4x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 41. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACAD: 55. 6% to $34. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — SUPN or PCRX or ACAD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SUPN or PCRX or ACAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
(PCRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PCRX: -48. 2%, ACAD: -17. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SUPN and PCRX and ACAD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PCRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.