SVM vs PAAS

For growth investors, Silvercorp Metals Inc.

(SVM) is the stronger pick with 38. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 30. 6% for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus Silvercorp Metals Inc. at 46. 5x. On forward P/E, Pan American Silver Corp. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Pan American Silver Corp. wins at 0. 49x versus Silvercorp Metals Inc. 's 3. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Silvercorp Metals Inc.

(SVM) delivered a total return of +123. 0%, compared to +69. 1% for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SVM returned +587. 4% versus PAAS's +326. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Silvercorp Metals Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning SVM is approximately 76% more volatile than PAAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 13% for Silvercorp Metals Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silvercorp Metals Inc.

(SVM) is pulling ahead at 38. 9% versus 30. 6% for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pan American Silver Corp. grew EPS 741. 9% year-over-year, compared to 40. 0% for Silvercorp Metals Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAAS leads at 35. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 0% net margin versus 19. 5% for Silvercorp Metals Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SVM leads at 34. 5% versus 32. 3% for PAAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SVM leads at 41. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus Silvercorp Metals Inc. 's 3. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 30. 4x for Silvercorp Metals Inc. — 18. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAAS: 32. 5% to $75. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) offers the highest yield at 0. 8%, versus 0. 2% for Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 8% yield, +326. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAAS: +326. 1%, SVM: +587. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

PAAS pays a dividend while SVM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.