Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SYNA vs MCHP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
SYNA vs MCHP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $4.04B | $53.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.14B | $4.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-62M | $-97M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | -7.8% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 23.5x | 62.8x |
| Total Debt | $880M | $5.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $392M | $772M |
SYNA vs MCHP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synaptics Incorpora… (SYNA) | 100 | 163.7 | +63.7% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 205.1 | +105.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SYNA vs MCHP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SYNA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth -138.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.28, Low D/E 63.1%, current ratio 2.78x
- 12.0% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
MCHP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.70, yield 1.8%
- 358.5% 10Y total return vs SYNA's 57.9%
- Beta 1.70, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.59x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.0% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.5x vs 62.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.2% margin vs SYNA's -5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.70 vs SYNA's 2.28 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +109.9% vs SYNA's +79.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.7% ROA vs SYNA's -2.4%, ROIC 1.8% vs -4.0% |
SYNA vs MCHP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SYNA vs MCHP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCHP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCHP is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 3.8x SYNA's $1.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -2.2% (MCHP) to -5.4% (SYNA).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $33M | $881M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$62M | -$97M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $145M | $820M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.1% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.2% | +15.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.4% | +164.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SYNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MCHP's 55.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SYNA's 92.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $53.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.5B | $58.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -85.48x | -9999.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.54x | 62.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 92.36x | 55.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.76x | 12.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.94x | 7.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.01x | 69.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCHP leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCHP delivers a -1.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SYNA. SYNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MCHP's 0.80x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.5% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.4% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.0% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.9% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.63x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $489M | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $392M | $772M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $880M | $5.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -71.25x | 0.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCHP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCHP five years ago would be worth $14,552 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,763 for SYNA. Over the past 12 months, MCHP leads with a +109.9% total return vs SYNA's +79.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCHP at 11.4% vs SYNA's 11.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.7% | +52.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +79.6% | +109.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.7% | +38.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.4% | +45.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.9% | +358.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.0% | +11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MCHP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCHP is the less volatile stock with a 1.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SYNA's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.28x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $105.50 | $99.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.40 | $46.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.9% | +99.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.3 | 77.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 704K | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SYNA as "Buy" and MCHP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -7.1% upside for SYNA (target: $97) vs -11.7% for MCHP (target: $87). MCHP is the only dividend payer here at 1.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $96.86 | $87.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.2% | +0.2% |
MCHP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SYNA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
SYNA vs MCHP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SYNA or MCHP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) is the stronger pick with 12.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Analysts rate Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SYNA or MCHP?
Over the past 5 years, Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) delivered a total return of +45.
5%, compared to -22. 4% for Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCHP returned +358. 5% versus SYNA's +57. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SYNA or MCHP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
70β versus Synaptics Incorporated's 2. 28β — meaning SYNA is approximately 34% more volatile than MCHP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 80% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SYNA or MCHP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) is pulling ahead at 12.
0% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Microchip Technology Incorporated grew EPS -100. 1% year-over-year, compared to -138. 6% for Synaptics Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, MCHP leads at -13. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SYNA or MCHP?
Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) is the more profitable company, earning -0.
0% net margin versus -4. 4% for Synaptics Incorporated — meaning it keeps -0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCHP leads at 6. 7% versus -8. 8% for SYNA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCHP leads at 56. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SYNA or MCHP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) trades at 23.
5x forward P/E versus 62. 8x for Microchip Technology Incorporated — 39. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SYNA: -7. 1% to $96. 86.
07Which pays a better dividend — SYNA or MCHP?
In this comparison, MCHP (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SYNA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is SYNA or MCHP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
8% yield, +358. 5% 10Y return). Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCHP: +358. 5%, SYNA: +57. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SYNA and MCHP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
MCHP pays a dividend while SYNA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.