TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
Aerospace & Defense
Market Cap$462M
5Y Perf.+847.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TATT vs DRS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
DRS
Leonardo DRS, Inc.
Aerospace & Defense
Market Cap$11.05B
5Y Perf.+728.8%
TATT vs DRS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TATT | DRS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $462M | $11.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $178M | $3.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $17M | $290M |
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | 24.2% |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | 9.9% |
| Forward P/E | 24.2x | 33.0x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $470M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $647M |
TATT vs DRS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TATT
DRS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAT Technologies Lt… (TATT) | 100 | 947.3 | +847.3% |
| Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) | 100 | 828.8 | +728.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TATT vs DRS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TATT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Leonardo DRS, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TATT
TAT Technologies Ltd.
The Income Pick
TATT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.72
- Rev growth 17.0%, EPS growth 37.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.72, Low D/E 10.0%, current ratio 4.89x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
DRS
Leonardo DRS, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
DRS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 54.1% 10Y total return vs TATT's 424.6%
- Beta 0.95, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.89x
- Beta 0.95 vs TATT's 1.72
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TATT | 17.0% revenue growth vs DRS's 12.8% |
| Value | TATT | Lower P/E (24.2x vs 33.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | TATT | 9.4% margin vs DRS's 7.8% |
| Stability / Safety | DRS | Beta 0.95 vs TATT's 1.72 |
| Dividends | DRS | 0.9% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TATT | +12.0% vs DRS's +0.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TATT | 8.1% ROA vs DRS's 6.8%, ROIC 10.3% vs 10.5% |
TATT vs DRS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2024
TATT vs DRS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTATTLAGGINGDRS
DRSLeonardo DRS, Inc.
2leads
TATTTAT Technologies Ltd.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs DRSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TATT4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TATT5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
DRS5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TATT4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
DRS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TATT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DRS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 20.8x TATT's $178M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.4% (TATT) to 7.8% (DRS). On growth, TATT holds the edge at +13.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TATTTAT Technologies … | DRSLeonardo DRS, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $178M | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $24M | $436M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $17M | $290M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $397M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +24.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | +9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +10.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.4% | +5.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | +21.1% |
TATT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TATT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.0x trailing earnings, TATT trades at a 35% valuation discount to DRS's 40.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TATT's 18.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DRS's 24.7x.
| Metric | TATTTAT Technologies … | DRSLeonardo DRS, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $462M | $11.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $429M | $10.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.00x | 40.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.21x | 33.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.24x | 24.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.60x | 3.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.48x | 4.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 115.04x | 48.70x |
TATT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DRS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DRS delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $11 for TATT. TATT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DRS's 0.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DRS scores 7/9 vs TATT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TATTTAT Technologies … | DRSLeonardo DRS, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.7% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +10.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$34M | -$177M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $647M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $470M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.30x | 40.86x |
DRS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TATT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TATT five years ago would be worth $68,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $33,193 for DRS. Over the past 12 months, TATT leads with a +12.0% total return vs DRS's +0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TATT at 85.6% vs DRS's 38.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TATTTAT Technologies … | DRSLeonardo DRS, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.1% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.0% | +0.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +539.5% | +165.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +583.7% | +231.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +424.6% | +5411.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +85.6% | +38.5% |
TATT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DRS is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TATT's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DRS currently trades 84.0% from its 52-week high vs TATT's 55.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TATTTAT Technologies … | DRSLeonardo DRS, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.72x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.37 | $49.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.52 | $32.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.3% | +84.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.1 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 203K | 1.1M |
DRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TATT as "Buy" and DRS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.8% upside for TATT (target: $53) vs 27.9% for DRS (target: $53). DRS is the only dividend payer here at 0.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TATTTAT Technologies … | DRSLeonardo DRS, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $53.00 | $53.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
TATT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). DRS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallTAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TATT vs DRS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TATT or DRS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TAT Technologies Ltd.
(TATT) is the stronger pick with 17. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 8% for Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS). TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT) offers the better valuation at 26. 0x trailing P/E (24. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TATT or DRS?
On trailing P/E, TAT Technologies Ltd.
(TATT) is the cheapest at 26. 0x versus Leonardo DRS, Inc. at 40. 2x. On forward P/E, TAT Technologies Ltd. is actually cheaper at 24. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TATT or DRS?
Over the past 5 years, TAT Technologies Ltd.
(TATT) delivered a total return of +583. 7%, compared to +231. 9% for Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DRS returned +54. 1% versus TATT's +424. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TATT or DRS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Leonardo DRS, Inc.
(DRS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus TAT Technologies Ltd. 's 1. 72β — meaning TATT is approximately 81% more volatile than DRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 17% for Leonardo DRS, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TATT or DRS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TAT Technologies Ltd.
(TATT) is pulling ahead at 17. 0% versus 12. 8% for Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TAT Technologies Ltd. grew EPS 37. 0% year-over-year, compared to 28. 7% for Leonardo DRS, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TATT leads at 28. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TATT or DRS?
TAT Technologies Ltd.
(TATT) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus 7. 6% for Leonardo DRS, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TATT leads at 10. 3% versus 9. 5% for DRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TATT leads at 24. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TATT or DRS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TAT Technologies Ltd.
(TATT) trades at 24. 2x forward P/E versus 33. 0x for Leonardo DRS, Inc. — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TATT: 48. 8% to $53. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TATT or DRS?
In this comparison, DRS (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. TATT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TATT or DRS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Leonardo DRS, Inc.
(DRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 0. 9% yield). TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DRS: +54. 1%, TATT: +424. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TATT and DRS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TATT is a small-cap high-growth stock; DRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. DRS pays a dividend while TATT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TATT: 13.4% · DRS: 5.9%)Net Margin>
%
(TATT: 9.4% · DRS: 7.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TATT: 26.0x · DRS: 40.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.