Discount Stores
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TBBB vs NGVC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Grocery Stores
TBBB vs NGVC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Discount Stores | Grocery Stores |
| Market Cap | $4.43B | $637M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $77.56B | $1.34B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2.81B | $48M |
| Gross Margin | 16.2% | 29.8% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 4.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.1x |
| Total Debt | $14.00B | $332M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.43B | $17M |
TBBB vs NGVC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BBB Foods Inc. (TBBB) | 100 | 183.4 | +83.4% |
| Natural Grocers by … (NGVC) | 100 | 166.9 | +66.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TBBB vs NGVC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TBBB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.6%, EPS growth -10.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.2%
- 27.6% revenue growth vs NGVC's 7.2%
- +24.3% vs NGVC's -42.8%
NGVC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 1.7%
- 139.5% 10Y total return vs TBBB's 102.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 1.06x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.6% revenue growth vs NGVC's 7.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.6% margin vs TBBB's -3.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs TBBB's 0.57, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.3% vs NGVC's -42.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.2% ROA vs TBBB's -10.5%, ROIC 8.9% vs -2.8% |
TBBB vs NGVC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TBBB vs NGVC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NGVC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TBBB is the larger business by revenue, generating $77.6B annually — 58.0x NGVC's $1.3B. NGVC is the more profitable business, keeping 3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TBBB's -3.6%. On growth, TBBB holds the edge at +32.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $77.6B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $88M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2.8B | $48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $82M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +29.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +3.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.3% | +0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.9% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
NGVC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NGVC's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TBBB's 71.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $637M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.2B | $952M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -28.58x | 13.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.79x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 71.54x | 10.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.04x | 0.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 18.48x | 3.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 67.41x | 26.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NGVC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NGVC delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-67 for TBBB. NGVC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TBBB's 3.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NGVC scores 8/9 vs TBBB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -67.2% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.5% | +7.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.8% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.1% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.39x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.6B | $315M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $17M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.0B | $332M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.43x | 31.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NGVC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NGVC five years ago would be worth $23,768 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,210 for TBBB. Over the past 12 months, TBBB leads with a +24.3% total return vs NGVC's -42.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NGVC at 39.9% vs TBBB's 26.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | +12.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.3% | -42.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.1% | +173.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.1% | +137.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.1% | +139.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.4% | +39.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TBBB and NGVC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NGVC is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TBBB's 0.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TBBB currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs NGVC's 45.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.09 | $61.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.81 | $23.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.0% | +45.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.1 | 48.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 478K | 120K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TBBB as "Buy" and NGVC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.6% upside for NGVC (target: $40) vs 13.4% for TBBB (target: $44). NGVC is the only dividend payer here at 1.71% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.67 | $40.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
NGVC leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
TBBB vs NGVC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TBBB or NGVC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BBB Foods Inc.
(TBBB) is the stronger pick with 27. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 2% for Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (NGVC). Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (NGVC) offers the better valuation at 13. 8x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BBB Foods Inc. (TBBB) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TBBB or NGVC?
Over the past 5 years, Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc.
(NGVC) delivered a total return of +137. 7%, compared to +102. 1% for BBB Foods Inc. (TBBB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NGVC returned +139. 5% versus TBBB's +102. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TBBB or NGVC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc.
(NGVC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus BBB Foods Inc. 's 0. 57β — meaning TBBB is approximately 918% more volatile than NGVC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (NGVC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 156% versus 3% for BBB Foods Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TBBB or NGVC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BBB Foods Inc.
(TBBB) is pulling ahead at 27. 6% versus 7. 2% for Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (NGVC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. grew EPS 36. 1% year-over-year, compared to -1067. 9% for BBB Foods Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TBBB leads at 32. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TBBB or NGVC?
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc.
(NGVC) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 5% net margin versus -3. 6% for BBB Foods Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NGVC leads at 4. 7% versus -0. 7% for TBBB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NGVC leads at 29. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TBBB or NGVC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NGVC: 44.
6% to $40. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — TBBB or NGVC?
In this comparison, NGVC (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. TBBB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TBBB or NGVC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc.
(NGVC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06), 1. 7% yield, +139. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NGVC: +139. 5%, TBBB: +102. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TBBB and NGVC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TBBB is a small-cap high-growth stock; NGVC is a small-cap deep-value stock. NGVC pays a dividend while TBBB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.