TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$1.30B
5Y Perf.+223.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TEN vs INSW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$4.24B
5Y Perf.+278.2%
TEN vs INSW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TEN | INSW |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.30B | $4.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $779M | $843M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $110M | $309M |
| Gross Margin | 33.4% | 47.2% |
| Operating Margin | 27.0% | 42.4% |
| Forward P/E | 6.4x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.76B | $576M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $348M | $117M |
TEN vs INSW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TEN
INSW
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tsakos Energy Navig… (TEN) | 100 | 323.4 | +223.4% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 378.2 | +278.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TEN vs INSW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TEN leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. International Seaways, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited
The Income Pick
TEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 5.6%
- Rev growth -9.6%, EPS growth -44.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 99.8%, current ratio 1.10x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
INSW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.7% 10Y total return vs TEN's 73.7%
- 36.7% margin vs TEN's 14.1%
- 11.8% ROA vs TEN's 3.0%, ROIC 9.4% vs 6.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TEN | -9.6% revenue growth vs INSW's -11.4% |
| Value | TEN | Lower P/E (6.4x vs 8.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | INSW | 36.7% margin vs TEN's 14.1% |
| Stability / Safety | TEN | Beta 0.33 vs INSW's 0.43 |
| Dividends | TEN | 5.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs INSW's 3.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TEN | +156.6% vs INSW's +146.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | INSW | 11.8% ROA vs TEN's 3.0%, ROIC 9.4% vs 6.9% |
TEN vs INSW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2021
FY 2025
TEN vs INSW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTENLAGGINGINSW
INSWInternational Seaways…
2leads
TENTsakos Energy Navigat…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs INSWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
INSW6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TEN5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
INSW9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TEN4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TEN2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TEN2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW and TEN operate at a comparable scale, with $843M and $779M in trailing revenue. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 36.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TEN's 14.1%. On growth, INSW holds the edge at +37.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TENTsakos Energy Nav… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $779M | $843M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $327M | $521M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $110M | $309M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$503M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.4% | +47.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | +42.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +36.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.5% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.7% | +37.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -71.6% | +2.6% |
INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.6x trailing earnings, TEN trades at a 38% valuation discount to INSW's 13.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TEN's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INSW's 10.0x.
| Metric | TENTsakos Energy Nav… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.58x | 13.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.44x | 8.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.11x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.49x | 10.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.62x | 5.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.72x | 2.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 111.18x |
TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $6 for TEN. INSW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TEN's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSW scores 6/9 vs TEN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TENTsakos Energy Nav… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +16.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.8% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $459M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $348M | $117M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $576M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.06x | 3.69x |
INSW leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSW five years ago would be worth $52,215 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $47,620 for TEN. Over the past 12 months, TEN leads with a +156.6% total return vs INSW's +146.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEN at 42.1% vs INSW's 38.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TENTsakos Energy Nav… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +99.5% | +87.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +156.6% | +146.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +186.7% | +167.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +376.2% | +422.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.7% | +970.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +42.1% | +38.9% |
TEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSW's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | TENTsakos Energy Nav… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.14 | $88.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.02 | $35.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.0 | 75.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 504K | 585K |
TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TEN as "Buy" and INSW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.8% upside for TEN (target: $50) vs -2.8% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, TEN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.64% vs INSW's 3.40%.
| Metric | TENTsakos Energy Nav… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.00 | $83.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.6% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.43 | $2.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TEN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). INSW leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
Best OverallTsakos Energy Navigation Li… (TEN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TEN vs INSW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TEN or INSW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the stronger pick with -9.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 4% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the better valuation at 8. 6x trailing P/E (6. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TEN or INSW?
On trailing P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the cheapest at 8.
6x versus International Seaways, Inc. at 13. 8x. On forward P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TEN or INSW?
Over the past 5 years, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) delivered a total return of +422. 1%, compared to +376. 2% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +970. 0% versus TEN's +73. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TEN or INSW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
33β versus International Seaways, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning INSW is approximately 29% more volatile than TEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 100% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TEN or INSW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is pulling ahead at -9.
6% versus -11. 4% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: International Seaways, Inc. grew EPS -25. 7% year-over-year, compared to -44. 4% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TEN or INSW?
International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 21. 9% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 34. 6% for TEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSW leads at 42. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TEN or INSW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) trades at 6.
4x forward P/E versus 8. 1x for International Seaways, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEN: 15. 8% to $50. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TEN or INSW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the highest yield at 5. 6%, versus 3. 4% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW).
09Is TEN or INSW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 4% yield, +970. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +970. 0%, TEN: +73. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TEN and INSW?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TEN: -9.7% · INSW: 37.6%)Net Margin>
%
(TEN: 14.1% · INSW: 36.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TEN: 8.6x · INSW: 13.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.