TEX
Terex Corporation
Agricultural - Machinery
Market Cap$4.23B
5Y Perf.+308.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TEX vs CNH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CNH
CNH Industrial N.V.
Agricultural - Machinery
Market Cap$13.42B
5Y Perf.+75.9%
TEX vs CNH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TEX | CNH |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $4.23B | $13.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.93B | $18.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $111M | $386M |
| Gross Margin | 17.3% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | 14.6% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 26.1x |
| Total Debt | $2.81B | $27.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $772M | $3.23B |
TEX vs CNH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TEX
CNH
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terex Corporation (TEX) | 100 | 408.7 | +308.7% |
| CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH) | 100 | 175.9 | +75.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TEX vs CNH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TEX leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. CNH Industrial N.V. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TEX
Terex Corporation
The Growth Play
TEX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth -32.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- 201.5% 10Y total return vs CNH's 81.4%
- 5.7% revenue growth vs CNH's -8.8%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CNH
CNH Industrial N.V.
The Income Pick
CNH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 2.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, current ratio 7.75x
- Beta 1.15, yield 2.5%, current ratio 7.75x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TEX | 5.7% revenue growth vs CNH's -8.8% |
| Value | TEX | Lower P/E (13.3x vs 26.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | CNH | 2.1% margin vs TEX's 1.9% |
| Stability / Safety | CNH | Beta 1.15 vs TEX's 2.13 |
| Dividends | CNH | 2.5% yield, vs TEX's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TEX | +64.3% vs CNH's -10.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TEX | 1.6% ROA vs CNH's 0.9%, ROIC 8.6% vs 6.6% |
TEX vs CNH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
TEX vs CNH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTEXLAGGINGCNH
CNHCNH Industrial N.V.
2leads
TEXTerex Corporation
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CNHMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CNH4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TEX7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TEX6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CNH1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNH is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.1B annually — 3.1x TEX's $5.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.1% (CNH) to 1.9% (TEX). On growth, TEX holds the edge at +41.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TEXTerex Corporation | CNHCNH Industrial N.… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.9B | $18.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $444M | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $111M | $386M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $322M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +31.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +14.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +10.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.1% | -0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +309.0% | -94.4% |
CNH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TEX and CNH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, TEX trades at a 27% valuation discount to CNH's 26.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TEX's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CNH's 10.9x.
| Metric | TEXTerex Corporation | CNHCNH Industrial N.… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $13.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.3B | $37.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.29x | 26.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.35x | 26.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.21x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.90x | 10.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | 0.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.03x | 1.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.13x | 6.73x |
Evenly matched — TEX and CNH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TEX leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CNH delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $4 for TEX. TEX carries lower financial leverage with a 1.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNH's 3.45x.
| Metric | TEXTerex Corporation | CNHCNH Industrial N.… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.1% | +4.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.34x | 3.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.0B | $23.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $772M | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.8B | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.74x | 1.76x |
TEX leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TEX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TEX five years ago would be worth $12,470 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,508 for CNH. Over the past 12 months, TEX leads with a +64.3% total return vs CNH's -10.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEX at 11.7% vs CNH's -7.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TEXTerex Corporation | CNHCNH Industrial N.… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.0% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +64.3% | -10.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.5% | -20.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.7% | -24.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +201.5% | +81.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.7% | -7.2% |
TEX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TEX and CNH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNH is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TEX's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TEX currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs CNH's 75.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TEXTerex Corporation | CNHCNH Industrial N.… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.13x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.50 | $14.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.52 | $9.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.8% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 44.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 15.2M |
Evenly matched — TEX and CNH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CNH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TEX as "Hold" and CNH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.9% upside for TEX (target: $80) vs 22.5% for CNH (target: $13). For income investors, CNH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs TEX's 1.06%.
| Metric | TEXTerex Corporation | CNHCNH Industrial N.… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $80.25 | $13.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.68 | $0.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | 0.0% |
CNH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
CNH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). TEX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallTerex Corporation (TEX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TEX vs CNH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TEX or CNH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Terex Corporation (TEX) is the stronger pick with 5.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). Terex Corporation (TEX) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TEX or CNH?
On trailing P/E, Terex Corporation (TEX) is the cheapest at 19.
3x versus CNH Industrial N. V. at 26. 4x. On forward P/E, Terex Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TEX or CNH?
Over the past 5 years, Terex Corporation (TEX) delivered a total return of +24.
7%, compared to -24. 9% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEX returned +201. 5% versus CNH's +81. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TEX or CNH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CNH Industrial N.
V. (CNH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Terex Corporation's 2. 13β — meaning TEX is approximately 85% more volatile than CNH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Terex Corporation (TEX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 134% versus 3% for CNH Industrial N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TEX or CNH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Terex Corporation (TEX) is pulling ahead at 5.
7% versus -8. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Terex Corporation grew EPS -32. 9% year-over-year, compared to -58. 6% for CNH Industrial N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEX leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TEX or CNH?
Terex Corporation (TEX) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
1% net margin versus 2. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. — meaning it keeps 4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNH leads at 15. 4% versus 8. 8% for TEX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNH leads at 31. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TEX or CNH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Terex Corporation (TEX) trades at 13.
3x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for CNH Industrial N. V. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEX: 24. 9% to $80. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — TEX or CNH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 1. 1% for Terex Corporation (TEX).
09Is TEX or CNH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CNH Industrial N.
V. (CNH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 2. 5% yield). Terex Corporation (TEX) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNH: +81. 4%, TEX: +201. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TEX and CNH?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TEX: 41.1% · CNH: -0.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TEX: 19.3x · CNH: 26.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.