Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TH vs MGRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
TH vs MGRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Rental & Leasing Services |
| Market Cap | $1.56B | $2.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $321M | $947M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $155M |
| Gross Margin | 8.3% | 45.9% |
| Operating Margin | -10.3% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $528M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $295K |
TH vs MGRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Target Hospitality … (TH) | 100 | 663.4 | +563.4% |
| McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) | 100 | 202.8 | +102.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TH vs MGRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.79
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 0.87x
- Beta 0.79, current ratio 0.87x
MGRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth -32.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.1%
- 393.0% 10Y total return vs TH's 58.9%
- 3.7% revenue growth vs TH's -17.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.7% revenue growth vs TH's -17.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.4% margin vs TH's -11.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs MGRC's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +115.6% vs MGRC's +6.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs TH's -6.9%, ROIC 10.5% vs -5.8% |
TH vs MGRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TH vs MGRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGRC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $947M annually — 3.0x TH's $321M. MGRC is the more profitable business, keeping 16.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TH's -11.6%. On growth, TH holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $321M | $947M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | $350M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | $155M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $196M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +45.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.6% | +16.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.3% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MGRC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MGRC's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TH's 37.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -42.30x | 17.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.02x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 37.84x | 9.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.87x | 2.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.00x | 2.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 221.44x | 13.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MGRC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGRC delivers a 12.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-9 for TH. TH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGRC's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGRC scores 6/9 vs TH's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.2% | +12.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.8% | +10.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.8% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $528M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $295,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $528M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.09x | 8.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TH and MGRC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TH five years ago would be worth $55,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,107 for MGRC. Over the past 12 months, TH leads with a +115.6% total return vs MGRC's +6.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGRC at 9.6% vs TH's 7.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +93.2% | +8.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +115.6% | +6.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.4% | +31.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +458.9% | +51.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.9% | +393.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.8% | +9.6% |
Risk & Volatility
TH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TH is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGRC's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TH currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs MGRC's 88.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.12 | $128.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.97 | $94.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.1% | +88.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 212K |
Analyst Outlook
MGRC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TH as "Buy" and MGRC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.8% upside for MGRC (target: $140) vs -7.3% for TH (target: $15). MGRC is the only dividend payer here at 1.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $140.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MGRC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TH leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
TH vs MGRC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TH or MGRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the stronger pick with 3.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 0% for Target Hospitality Corp. (TH). McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) offers the better valuation at 17. 8x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Target Hospitality Corp. (TH) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TH or MGRC?
Over the past 5 years, Target Hospitality Corp.
(TH) delivered a total return of +458. 9%, compared to +51. 1% for McGrath RentCorp (MGRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGRC returned +394. 1% versus TH's +60. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TH or MGRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Target Hospitality Corp.
(TH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus McGrath RentCorp's 0. 87β — meaning MGRC is approximately 10% more volatile than TH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Target Hospitality Corp. (TH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 43% for McGrath RentCorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TH or MGRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is pulling ahead at 3.
7% versus -17. 0% for Target Hospitality Corp. (TH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McGrath RentCorp grew EPS -32. 7% year-over-year, compared to -152. 9% for Target Hospitality Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGRC leads at 14. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TH or MGRC?
McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
6% net margin versus -11. 6% for Target Hospitality Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGRC leads at 25. 9% versus -10. 0% for TH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGRC leads at 46. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TH or MGRC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGRC: 23.
8% to $140. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — TH or MGRC?
In this comparison, MGRC (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. TH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TH or MGRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McGrath RentCorp (MGRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
87), 1. 7% yield, +394. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGRC: +394. 1%, TH: +60. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TH and MGRC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGRC is a small-cap deep-value stock. MGRC pays a dividend while TH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.