Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
THS vs CENT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
THS vs CENT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $1.46B | $2.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.34B | $3.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-242M | $171M |
| Gross Margin | 17.7% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | -4.6% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.57B | $1.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $290M | $882M |
THS vs CENT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TreeHouse Foods, In… (THS) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.7% |
| Central Garden & Pe… (CENT) | 100 | 117.8 | +17.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: THS vs CENT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
THS is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (12.8x vs 13.0x)
- +10.6% vs CENT's +6.6%
CENT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65
- Rev growth -2.2%, EPS growth 57.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.1%
- 148.2% 10Y total return vs THS's -73.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.2% revenue growth vs THS's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 13.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.4% margin vs THS's -7.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs THS's 1.18, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.6% vs CENT's +6.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs THS's -6.4%, ROIC 9.1% vs 2.7% |
THS vs CENT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
THS vs CENT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CENT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
THS and CENT operate at a comparable scale, with $3.3B and $3.2B in trailing revenue. CENT is the more profitable business, keeping 5.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to THS's -7.2%. On growth, CENT holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.3B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $302M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$242M | $171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $101M | $282M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +32.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.6% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.2% | +5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.1% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -74.1% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — THS and CENT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, CENT trades at a 70% valuation discount to THS's 47.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CENT's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than THS's 10.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 47.90x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.84x | 12.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.95x | 8.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.44x | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 1.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.59x | 7.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CENT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CENT delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-19 for THS. CENT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to THS's 1.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CENT scores 8/9 vs THS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.2% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.01x | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $558M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $290M | $882M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.98x | 1200.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CENT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CENT five years ago would be worth $7,926 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,057 for THS. Over the past 12 months, THS leads with a +10.6% total return vs CENT's +6.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CENT at 7.8% vs THS's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.0% | +15.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.6% | +6.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.5% | +25.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.4% | -20.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.6% | +148.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.1% | +7.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — THS and CENT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CENT is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than THS's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. THS currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs CENT's 89.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.85 | $41.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.85 | $28.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.3% | +89.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 41.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 28.9M | 73K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates THS as "Hold" and CENT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.5% upside for CENT (target: $51) vs -5.9% for THS (target: $23).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $51.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.2% | +6.8% |
CENT leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
THS vs CENT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is THS or CENT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the stronger pick with -2.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS). Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — THS or CENT?
On trailing P/E, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the cheapest at 14.
4x versus TreeHouse Foods, Inc. at 47. 9x. On forward P/E, TreeHouse Foods, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — THS or CENT?
Over the past 5 years, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) delivered a total return of -20.
7%, compared to -49. 4% for TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CENT returned +148. 2% versus THS's -73. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — THS or CENT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus TreeHouse Foods, Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning THS is approximately 81% more volatile than CENT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 91% versus 101% for TreeHouse Foods, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — THS or CENT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is pulling ahead at -2.
2% versus -2. 3% for TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Central Garden & Pet Company grew EPS 57. 4% year-over-year, compared to -45. 7% for TreeHouse Foods, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, THS leads at 6. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — THS or CENT?
Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
2% net margin versus 0. 8% for TreeHouse Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CENT leads at 8. 5% versus 3. 1% for THS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CENT leads at 31. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is THS or CENT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TreeHouse Foods, Inc.
(THS) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for Central Garden & Pet Company — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CENT: 38. 5% to $51. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — THS or CENT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is THS or CENT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
65), +148. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CENT: +148. 2%, THS: -73. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between THS and CENT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: THS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CENT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.