TU
TELUS Corporation
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$20.01B
5Y Perf.-26.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TU vs VZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$200.09B
5Y Perf.-17.3%
TU vs VZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TU | VZ |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $20.01B | $200.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20.51B | $138.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.11B | $17.17B |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 11.5% | 21.2% |
| Forward P/E | 19.5x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $31.46B | $200.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.62B | $19.05B |
TU vs VZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TU
VZ
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TELUS Corporation (TU) | 100 | 73.8 | -26.2% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 100 | 82.7 | -17.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TU vs VZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: VZ leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. TELUS Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TU
TELUS Corporation
The Income Pick
TU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 6.1%
- Rev growth 1.8%, EPS growth 7.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 45.5% 10Y total return vs VZ's 42.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
The Defensive Pick
VZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.11, current ratio 0.91x
- 2.5% revenue growth vs TU's 1.8%
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 19.5x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | VZ | 2.5% revenue growth vs TU's 1.8% |
| Value | VZ | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 19.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | VZ | 12.4% margin vs TU's 5.4% |
| Stability / Safety | VZ | Lower D/E ratio (189.7% vs 189.8%) |
| Dividends | TU | 6.1% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs VZ's 5.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | VZ | +13.7% vs TU's -8.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | VZ | 4.4% ROA vs TU's 1.9%, ROIC 8.0% vs 3.9% |
TU vs VZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
TU vs VZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLVZLAGGINGTU
TUTELUS Corporation
0leads
VZVerizon Communication…
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TUMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
VZ5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
VZ4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
VZ5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
VZ5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
VZ2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $138.2B annually — 6.7x TU's $20.5B. VZ is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TU's 5.4%.
| Metric | TUTELUS Corporation | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20.5B | $138.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7.6B | $47.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $17.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.7B | $19.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.7% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +21.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.1% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | -53.4% |
VZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
VZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, VZ trades at a 52% valuation discount to TU's 24.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VZ's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TU's 8.7x.
| Metric | TUTELUS Corporation | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.0B | $200.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41.2B | $381.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.19x | 11.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.51x | 9.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.72x | 8.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.33x | 1.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.61x | 1.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.57x | 9.94x |
VZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VZ leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VZ delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for TU. VZ carries lower financial leverage with a 1.90x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TU's 1.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TU scores 5/9 vs VZ's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TUTELUS Corporation | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | +16.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.8% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.90x | 1.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $28.8B | $181.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.6B | $19.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $31.5B | $200.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.39x |
VZ leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VZ five years ago would be worth $10,237 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,536 for TU. Over the past 12 months, VZ leads with a +13.7% total return vs TU's -8.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VZ at 13.7% vs TU's -7.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TUTELUS Corporation | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.1% | +20.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.2% | +13.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.4% | +46.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.6% | +2.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.5% | +42.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.7% | +13.7% |
VZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VZ is the less volatile stock with a -0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TU's 0.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VZ currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs TU's 76.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TUTELUS Corporation | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | -0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.74 | $51.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.69 | $10.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.6% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.6 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.3M | 24.4M |
VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TU and VZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TU as "Buy" and VZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 76.2% upside for TU (target: $23) vs 8.7% for VZ (target: $52). For income investors, TU offers the higher dividend yield at 6.09% vs VZ's 5.72%.
| Metric | TUTELUS Corporation | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.59 | $51.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.1% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.06 | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — TU and VZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
VZ leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallVerizon Communications Inc. (VZ)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TU vs VZ: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TU or VZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the stronger pick with 2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 8% for TELUS Corporation (TU). Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TELUS Corporation (TU) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TU or VZ?
On trailing P/E, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus TELUS Corporation at 24. 2x. On forward P/E, Verizon Communications Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TU or VZ?
Over the past 5 years, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) delivered a total return of +2. 4%, compared to -14. 6% for TELUS Corporation (TU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TU returned +45. 5% versus VZ's +42. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TU or VZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 11β versus TELUS Corporation's 0. 11β — meaning TU is approximately -202% more volatile than VZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 190% versus 190% for TELUS Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TU or VZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is pulling ahead at 2. 5% versus 1. 8% for TELUS Corporation (TU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TELUS Corporation grew EPS 7. 5% year-over-year, compared to -2. 2% for Verizon Communications Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TU leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TU or VZ?
Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus 5. 4% for TELUS Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VZ leads at 21. 2% versus 11. 5% for TU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VZ leads at 45. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TU or VZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for TELUS Corporation — 9. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TU: 76. 2% to $22. 59.
08Which pays a better dividend — TU or VZ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TELUS Corporation (TU) offers the highest yield at 6. 1%, versus 5. 7% for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ).
09Is TU or VZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 11), 5. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VZ: +42. 2%, TU: +45. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TU and VZ?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TU is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; VZ is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TU: 1.1% · VZ: 2.0%)Net Margin>
%
(TU: 5.4% · VZ: 12.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TU: 24.2x · VZ: 11.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.