Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UPC vs HCWB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
UPC vs HCWB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2M | $14M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41M | $422K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | -21.2% |
| Operating Margin | -26.7% | -28.1% |
| Total Debt | $9M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $5M |
UPC vs HCWB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Universe Pharmaceut… (UPC) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| HCW Biologics Inc. (HCWB) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UPC vs HCWB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UPC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 16.5%, current ratio 4.07x
- Beta 1.26, current ratio 4.07x
HCWB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -9.7%, EPS growth -10.0%
- -99.9% 10Y total return vs UPC's -100.0%
- -9.7% revenue growth vs UPC's -22.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -9.7% revenue growth vs UPC's -22.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | -30.3% margin vs HCWB's -28.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs HCWB's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -36.9% vs HCWB's -94.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -18.6% ROA vs HCWB's -47.4%, ROIC -7.8% vs -240.1% |
UPC vs HCWB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPC is the larger business by revenue, generating $41M annually — 96.9x HCWB's $422,025. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -30.3% (UPC) to -28.6% (HCWB). On growth, UPC holds the edge at -14.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41M | $422,025 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | -$13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | -21.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.7% | -28.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.3% | -28.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -37.2% | -30.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.1% | -96.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.1% | -19.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — UPC and HCWB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $14M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$23M | $23M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -0.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 5.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
UPC leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPC delivers a -27.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-27 in annual profit, vs $-9 for HCWB. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UPC scores 4/9 vs HCWB's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.0% | -9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.6% | -47.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.8% | -2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.6% | -2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -22.11x | -11.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCWB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HCWB five years ago would be worth $14 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for UPC. Over the past 12 months, UPC leads with a -36.9% total return vs HCWB's -94.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCWB at -81.7% vs UPC's -89.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.2% | -68.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.9% | -94.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -99.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -89.5% | -81.7% |
Risk & Volatility
UPC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UPC is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HCWB's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UPC currently trades 25.7% from its 52-week high vs HCWB's 2.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.00 | $17.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.00 | $0.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.7% | +2.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 47.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 10.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
UPC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HCWB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
UPC vs HCWB: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UPC or HCWB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HCW Biologics Inc.
(HCWB) is the stronger pick with -9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 4% for Universe Pharmaceuticals Inc. (UPC). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UPC or HCWB?
Over the past 5 years, HCW Biologics Inc.
(HCWB) delivered a total return of -99. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Universe Pharmaceuticals Inc. (UPC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCWB returned -99. 9% versus UPC's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UPC or HCWB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Universe Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(UPC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus HCW Biologics Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning HCWB is approximately 22% more volatile than UPC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — UPC or HCWB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HCW Biologics Inc.
(HCWB) is pulling ahead at -9. 7% versus -22. 4% for Universe Pharmaceuticals Inc. (UPC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Universe Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 26. 5% year-over-year, compared to -10. 0% for HCW Biologics Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UPC or HCWB?
Universe Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(UPC) is the more profitable company, earning -20. 6% net margin versus -1169. 7% for HCW Biologics Inc. — meaning it keeps -20. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPC leads at -16. 3% versus -1148. 5% for HCWB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HCWB leads at 37. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — UPC or HCWB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is UPC or HCWB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Universe Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(UPC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26)). HCW Biologics Inc. (HCWB) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UPC: -100. 0%, HCWB: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between UPC and HCWB?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.