Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
VABK vs NBTB vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
VABK vs NBTB vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $244M | $2.52B | $207M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $83M | $902M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $169M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 69.0% | 73.6% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 28.9% | 24.3% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 11.5x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $327M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $185M | $119M |
VABK vs NBTB vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia National B… (VABK) | 100 | 178.2 | +78.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VABK vs NBTB vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VABK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 3.53x
- Beta 0.48, yield 3.1%, current ratio 3.53x
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- PEG 1.64 vs VABK's 3.36
- NIM 3.1% vs CZWI's 2.9%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 149.0% 10Y total return vs VABK's 146.5%
- +52.1% vs NBTB's +18.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 12.7x), PEG 1.64 vs 3.36 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs NBTB's 0.76, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs NBTB's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
VABK vs NBTB vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VABK vs NBTB vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VABK leads in 2 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VABK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $902M annually — 10.8x VABK's $83M. VABK is the more profitable business, keeping 23.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $83M | $902M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $241M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $169M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $21M | $225M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.0% | +73.6% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | +24.3% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +18.8% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | +24.9% | +12.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.0% | +39.5% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.7x trailing earnings, VABK trades at a 14% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 2.06x vs VABK's 3.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $244M | $2.5B | $207M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $268M | $2.7B | $140M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.68x | 14.47x | 14.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.54x | 11.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.36x | 2.06x | 2.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.13x | 11.03x | 15.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.93x | 2.90x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 1.29x | 1.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.76x | 11.49x | 19.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VABK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VABK delivers a 11.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. VABK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZWI's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +9.5% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.1% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +7.9% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.6% | +2.4% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.17x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | $142M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $185M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $327M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.94x | 1.05x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,438 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs NBTB's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs NBTB's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.2% | +17.6% | +24.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.1% | +18.3% | +52.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.9% | +48.5% | +153.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.9% | +44.4% | +69.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.5% | +108.5% | +149.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.4% | +14.1% | +36.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VABK and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VABK is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs VABK's 92.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.76x | 0.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.58 | $48.27 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.48 | $39.20 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.6% | +99.8% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 63.1 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 266K | 41K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VABK and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". For income investors, VABK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.12% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +3.0% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 13 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | $1.43 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +3.0% |
VABK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NBTB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
VABK vs NBTB vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VABK or NBTB or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VABK or NBTB or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) is the cheapest at 12.
7x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 64x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VABK or NBTB or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to +44. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +149. 0% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VABK or NBTB or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
48β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning NBTB is approximately 59% more volatile than VABK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 28% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VABK or NBTB or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Virginia National Bankshares Corporation grew EPS 12. 7% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VABK or NBTB or CZWI?
Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
1% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VABK leads at 28. 9% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VABK or NBTB or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 64x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — VABK or NBTB or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is VABK or NBTB or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
48), 3. 1% yield, +146. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VABK: +146. 5%, NBTB: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VABK and NBTB and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.