Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VCIC vs FSCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
VCIC vs FSCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $242M | $1.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $254M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $188M |
| Gross Margin | — | 81.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 77.5% |
| Forward P/E | 141.4x | 5.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $453M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $189M |
VCIC vs FSCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vine Hill Capital I… (VCIC) | 100 | 110.3 | +10.3% |
| FS Credit Opportuni… (FSCO) | 100 | 76.6 | -23.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VCIC vs FSCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VCIC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +6.5% vs FSCO's -16.4%
FSCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 70.5% 10Y total return vs VCIC's 10.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 31.9%, current ratio 5.84x
- Beta 0.64, yield 13.9%, current ratio 5.84x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Lower P/E (5.4x vs 141.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 74.2% margin vs VCIC's 1.4% | |
| Dividends | 13.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.5% vs FSCO's -16.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs VCIC's 2.7% |
VCIC vs FSCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSCO and VCIC operate at a comparable scale, with $254M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $254M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | — |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$947,000 | — |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +81.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +77.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +74.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +26.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.0% | — |
Valuation Metrics
FSCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, FSCO trades at a 96% valuation discount to VCIC's 141.4x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $242M | $1.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $241M | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 141.39x | 5.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 0.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSCO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSCO delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for VCIC.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.6% | +13.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.8% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $264M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $189M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $453M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSCO five years ago would be worth $17,050 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,044 for VCIC. Over the past 12 months, VCIC leads with a +6.5% total return vs FSCO's -16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSCO at 19.7% vs VCIC's 3.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | -15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.5% | -16.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.4% | +71.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.4% | +70.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.4% | +70.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.4% | +19.7% |
Risk & Volatility
VCIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VCIC is the less volatile stock with a -0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FSCO's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VCIC currently trades 80.3% from its 52-week high vs FSCO's 67.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.36x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.70 | $7.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.32 | $4.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.3% | +67.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 115K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
FSCO is the only dividend payer here at 13.94% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +13.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FSCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). VCIC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
VCIC vs FSCO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VCIC or FSCO a better buy right now?
FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
(FSCO) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VCIC or FSCO?
On trailing P/E, FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
(FSCO) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp. at 141. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VCIC or FSCO?
Over the past 5 years, FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
(FSCO) delivered a total return of +70. 5%, compared to +10. 4% for Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp. (VCIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSCO returned +70. 6% versus VCIC's +10. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VCIC or FSCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp.
(VCIC) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 36β versus FS Credit Opportunities Corp. 's 0. 64β — meaning FSCO is approximately -276% more volatile than VCIC relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — VCIC or FSCO?
FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
(FSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 74. 2% net margin versus 0. 0% for Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp. — meaning it keeps 74. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSCO leads at 77. 5% versus 0. 0% for VCIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FSCO leads at 81. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — VCIC or FSCO?
In this comparison, FSCO (13.
9% yield) pays a dividend. VCIC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is VCIC or FSCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp.
(VCIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 36)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VCIC: +10. 4%, FSCO: +70. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between VCIC and FSCO?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VCIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FSCO is a small-cap deep-value stock. FSCO pays a dividend while VCIC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.