Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VG vs LNG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VG
Venture Global, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$23.63B
5Y Perf.-41.3%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$54.93B
5Y Perf.+16.9%

VG vs LNG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VG logoVG
LNG logoLNG
IndustryOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$23.63B$54.93B
Revenue (TTM)$13.77B$19.73B
Net Income (TTM)$2.58B$5.33B
Gross Margin68.3%36.2%
Operating Margin36.6%30.2%
Forward P/E9.5x17.5x
Total Debt$1.51B$28.61B
Cash & Equiv.$2.35B$1.58B

VG vs LNGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VG
LNG
StockJan 25May 26Return
Venture Global, Inc. (VG)10058.7-41.3%
Cheniere Energy, In… (LNG)100116.9+16.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VG vs LNG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: VG leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Cheniere Energy, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
VG
Venture Global, Inc.
The Income Pick

VG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 1.5%
  • Rev growth 176.9%, EPS growth 41.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 12.6%, current ratio 0.93x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

LNG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 7.0% 10Y total return vs VG's -49.6%
  • 27.0% margin vs VG's 18.7%
  • 11.7% ROA vs VG's 5.3%, ROIC 10.9% vs 17.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVG logoVG176.9% revenue growth vs LNG's 24.4%
ValueVG logoVGLower P/E (9.5x vs 17.5x)
Quality / MarginsLNG logoLNG27.0% margin vs VG's 18.7%
Stability / SafetyVG logoVGLower D/E ratio (12.6% vs 218.8%)
DividendsVG logoVG1.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs LNG's 0.8%
Momentum (1Y)VG logoVG+38.7% vs LNG's +12.4%
Efficiency (ROA)LNG logoLNG11.7% ROA vs VG's 5.3%, ROIC 10.9% vs 17.3%

VG vs LNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

VGVenture Global, Inc.
FY 2025
Liquefied Natural Gas
99.4%$13.7B
Product and Service, Other
0.6%$82M
LNGCheniere Energy, Inc.
FY 2024
Liquefied Natural Gas
94.9%$15.0B
Product and Service, Other
4.2%$669M
Regasification Service
0.9%$135M

VG vs LNG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLNGLAGGINGVG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — VG and LNG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LNG and VG operate at a comparable scale, with $19.7B and $13.8B in trailing revenue. LNG is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VG's 18.7%. On growth, VG holds the edge at +191.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVG logoVGVenture Global, I…LNG logoLNGCheniere Energy, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$13.8B$19.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$6.0B$7.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2.6B$5.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$6.8B$4.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+68.3%+36.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+36.6%+30.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.7%+27.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-49.4%+24.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+191.7%+19.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.9%+146.7%
Evenly matched — VG and LNG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

VG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 10.8x trailing earnings, LNG trades at a 22% valuation discount to VG's 14.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VG's 3.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LNG's 11.3x.

MetricVG logoVGVenture Global, I…LNG logoLNGCheniere Energy, …
Market CapShares × price$23.6B$54.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$22.8B$82.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.95x10.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.50x17.54x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.81x11.30x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.72x2.80x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.64x4.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.32x
VG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LNG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

LNG delivers a 46.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $26 for VG. VG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LNG's 2.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LNG scores 7/9 vs VG's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricVG logoVGVenture Global, I…LNG logoLNGCheniere Energy, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+25.8%+46.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.3%+11.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+17.3%+10.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.3%+12.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x2.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$847M$27.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.4B$1.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.5B$28.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.47x9.74x
LNG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LNG five years ago would be worth $33,471 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,035 for VG. Over the past 12 months, VG leads with a +38.7% total return vs LNG's +12.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LNG at 21.3% vs VG's -20.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVG logoVGVenture Global, I…LNG logoLNGCheniere Energy, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+70.7%+32.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+38.7%+12.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.6%+78.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.6%+234.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.6%+695.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-20.4%+21.3%
LNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LNG is the less volatile stock with a -0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VG's 0.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNG currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs VG's 61.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVG logoVGVenture Global, I…LNG logoLNGCheniere Energy, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.22x-0.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.50$300.89
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.83$186.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+61.5%+86.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.054.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded28.7M3.2M
LNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — VG and LNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates VG as "Buy" and LNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.1% upside for VG (target: $13) vs 1.5% for LNG (target: $265). For income investors, VG offers the higher dividend yield at 1.47% vs LNG's 0.78%.

MetricVG logoVGVenture Global, I…LNG logoLNGCheniere Energy, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.61$265.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts3127
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises14
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.18$2.05
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+5.0%
Evenly matched — VG and LNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LNG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). VG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallCheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VG vs LNG: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VG or LNG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Venture Global, Inc.

(VG) is the stronger pick with 176. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 24. 4% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Venture Global, Inc. (VG) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — VG or LNG?

On trailing P/E, Cheniere Energy, Inc.

(LNG) is the cheapest at 10. 8x versus Venture Global, Inc. at 14. 0x. On forward P/E, Venture Global, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — VG or LNG?

Over the past 5 years, Cheniere Energy, Inc.

(LNG) delivered a total return of +234. 7%, compared to -49. 6% for Venture Global, Inc. (VG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNG returned +695. 9% versus VG's -49. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — VG or LNG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cheniere Energy, Inc.

(LNG) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 33β versus Venture Global, Inc. 's 0. 22β — meaning VG is approximately -167% more volatile than LNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Venture Global, Inc. (VG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 2% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — VG or LNG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Venture Global, Inc.

(VG) is pulling ahead at 176. 9% versus 24. 4% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cheniere Energy, Inc. grew EPS 69. 9% year-over-year, compared to 41. 0% for Venture Global, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VG leads at 28. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — VG or LNG?

Cheniere Energy, Inc.

(LNG) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 1% net margin versus 16. 4% for Venture Global, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VG leads at 36. 6% versus 27. 0% for LNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VG leads at 49. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is VG or LNG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Venture Global, Inc.

(VG) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for Cheniere Energy, Inc. — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VG: 5. 1% to $12. 61.

08

Which pays a better dividend — VG or LNG?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Venture Global, Inc. (VG) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 8% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG).

09

Is VG or LNG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cheniere Energy, Inc.

(LNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 33), 0. 8% yield, +695. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNG: +695. 9%, VG: -49. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between VG and LNG?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

VG

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 95%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LNG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform VG and LNG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(VG: 191.7% · LNG: 19.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(VG: 18.7% · LNG: 27.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(VG: 14.0x · LNG: 10.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.