Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VG vs LNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
VG vs LNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $23.63B | $54.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.77B | $19.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.58B | $5.33B |
| Gross Margin | 68.3% | 36.2% |
| Operating Margin | 36.6% | 30.2% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.51B | $28.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.35B | $1.58B |
VG vs LNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Venture Global, Inc. (VG) | 100 | 58.7 | -41.3% |
| Cheniere Energy, In… (LNG) | 100 | 116.9 | +16.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VG vs LNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 176.9%, EPS growth 41.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 12.6%, current ratio 0.93x
LNG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs VG's -49.6%
- 27.0% margin vs VG's 18.7%
- 11.7% ROA vs VG's 5.3%, ROIC 10.9% vs 17.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 176.9% revenue growth vs LNG's 24.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 17.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.0% margin vs VG's 18.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (12.6% vs 218.8%) | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs LNG's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.7% vs LNG's +12.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.7% ROA vs VG's 5.3%, ROIC 10.9% vs 17.3% |
VG vs LNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VG vs LNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VG and LNG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNG and VG operate at a comparable scale, with $19.7B and $13.8B in trailing revenue. LNG is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VG's 18.7%. On growth, VG holds the edge at +191.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.8B | $19.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.0B | $7.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.6B | $5.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6.8B | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.3% | +36.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.6% | +30.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -49.4% | +24.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +191.7% | +19.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.9% | +146.7% |
Valuation Metrics
VG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.8x trailing earnings, LNG trades at a 22% valuation discount to VG's 14.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VG's 3.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LNG's 11.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23.6B | $54.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.8B | $82.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.95x | 10.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.50x | 17.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.81x | 11.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.72x | 2.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.64x | 4.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LNG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNG delivers a 46.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $26 for VG. VG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LNG's 2.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LNG scores 7/9 vs VG's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.8% | +46.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +11.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.3% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 2.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$847M | $27.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.4B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $28.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.47x | 9.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNG five years ago would be worth $33,471 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,035 for VG. Over the past 12 months, VG leads with a +38.7% total return vs LNG's +12.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LNG at 21.3% vs VG's -20.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +70.7% | +32.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.7% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.6% | +78.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.6% | +234.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.6% | +695.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.4% | +21.3% |
Risk & Volatility
LNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNG is the less volatile stock with a -0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VG's 0.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNG currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs VG's 61.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | -0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.50 | $300.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.83 | $186.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.5% | +86.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 28.7M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VG and LNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VG as "Buy" and LNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.1% upside for VG (target: $13) vs 1.5% for LNG (target: $265). For income investors, VG offers the higher dividend yield at 1.47% vs LNG's 0.78%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.61 | $265.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.18 | $2.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.0% |
LNG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). VG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
VG vs LNG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VG or LNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Venture Global, Inc.
(VG) is the stronger pick with 176. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 24. 4% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Venture Global, Inc. (VG) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VG or LNG?
On trailing P/E, Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the cheapest at 10. 8x versus Venture Global, Inc. at 14. 0x. On forward P/E, Venture Global, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VG or LNG?
Over the past 5 years, Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) delivered a total return of +234. 7%, compared to -49. 6% for Venture Global, Inc. (VG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNG returned +695. 9% versus VG's -49. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VG or LNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 33β versus Venture Global, Inc. 's 0. 22β — meaning VG is approximately -167% more volatile than LNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Venture Global, Inc. (VG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 2% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VG or LNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Venture Global, Inc.
(VG) is pulling ahead at 176. 9% versus 24. 4% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cheniere Energy, Inc. grew EPS 69. 9% year-over-year, compared to 41. 0% for Venture Global, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VG leads at 28. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VG or LNG?
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 1% net margin versus 16. 4% for Venture Global, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VG leads at 36. 6% versus 27. 0% for LNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VG leads at 49. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VG or LNG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Venture Global, Inc.
(VG) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for Cheniere Energy, Inc. — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VG: 5. 1% to $12. 61.
08Which pays a better dividend — VG or LNG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Venture Global, Inc. (VG) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 8% for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG).
09Is VG or LNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cheniere Energy, Inc.
(LNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 33), 0. 8% yield, +695. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNG: +695. 9%, VG: -49. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VG and LNG?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.