Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VSH vs CTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
VSH vs CTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $4.23B | $1.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.07B | $556M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 19.4% | 38.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | 15.9% |
| Forward P/E | 63.4x | 25.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.17B | $122M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $515M | $82M |
VSH vs CTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vishay Intertechnol… (VSH) | 100 | 210.7 | +110.7% |
| CTS Corporation (CTS) | 100 | 289.4 | +189.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VSH vs CTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VSH is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.48, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.62x
- 1.1% yield, vs CTS's 0.3%
- +169.5% vs CTS's +54.7%
CTS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.46, yield 0.3%
- Rev growth 5.2%, EPS growth 15.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.6%
- 264.1% 10Y total return vs VSH's 208.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.2% revenue growth vs VSH's 4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.4x vs 63.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs VSH's -0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.46 vs VSH's 2.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, vs CTS's 0.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +169.5% vs CTS's +54.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.9% ROA vs VSH's -0.2%, ROIC 11.1% vs 1.6% |
VSH vs CTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VSH vs CTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VSH is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 5.5x CTS's $556M. CTS is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VSH's -0.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $556M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $282M | $123M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$89M | $88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +38.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +15.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.1% | +10.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +101.5% | +34.1% |
Valuation Metrics
VSH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CTS's 15.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VSH's 17.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -518.31x | 28.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 63.44x | 25.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.35x | 15.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.38x | 3.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.23x | 3.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CTS leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTS delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-0 for VSH. CTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VSH's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTS scores 7/9 vs VSH's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.4% | +12.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.6% | +11.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +12.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $654M | $40M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $515M | $82M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $122M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.66x | 18.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VSH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CTS five years ago would be worth $19,377 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,360 for VSH. Over the past 12 months, VSH leads with a +169.5% total return vs CTS's +54.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VSH at 18.1% vs CTS's 14.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +124.7% | +40.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +169.5% | +54.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.9% | +49.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.6% | +93.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +208.3% | +264.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.1% | +14.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTS is the less volatile stock with a 1.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSH's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.48x | 1.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.85 | $62.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.77 | $36.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.3% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 78.8 | 70.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 211K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VSH and CTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VSH as "Buy" and CTS as "Hold". For income investors, VSH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.06% vs CTS's 0.26%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.36 | $0.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +3.2% |
CTS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VSH leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
VSH vs CTS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VSH or CTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CTS Corporation (CTS) is the stronger pick with 5.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 5% for Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (VSH). CTS Corporation (CTS) offers the better valuation at 28. 2x trailing P/E (25. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (VSH) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VSH or CTS?
On forward P/E, CTS Corporation is actually cheaper at 25.
4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VSH or CTS?
Over the past 5 years, CTS Corporation (CTS) delivered a total return of +93.
8%, compared to +53. 6% for Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (VSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTS returned +264. 1% versus VSH's +208. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VSH or CTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CTS Corporation (CTS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
46β versus Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning VSH is approximately 70% more volatile than CTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CTS Corporation (CTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 56% for Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VSH or CTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CTS Corporation (CTS) is pulling ahead at 5.
2% versus 4. 5% for Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (VSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. grew EPS 71. 3% year-over-year, compared to 15. 9% for CTS Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTS leads at -2. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VSH or CTS?
CTS Corporation (CTS) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
0% net margin versus -0. 3% for Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTS leads at 15. 6% versus 1. 9% for VSH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTS leads at 38. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VSH or CTS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CTS Corporation (CTS) trades at 25.
4x forward P/E versus 63. 4x for Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. — 38. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — VSH or CTS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (VSH) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 3% for CTS Corporation (CTS).
09Is VSH or CTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CTS Corporation (CTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+264.
1% 10Y return). Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (VSH) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTS: +264. 1%, VSH: +208. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VSH and CTS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
VSH pays a dividend while CTS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.