VTLE vs MTDR

For growth investors, Vital Energy, Inc.

(VTLE) is the stronger pick with 26. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Matador Resources Company (MTDR). Matador Resources Company (MTDR) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Matador Resources Company (MTDR) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Vital Energy, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) delivered a total return of +118.

5%, compared to -50. 7% for Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTDR returned +205. 6% versus VTLE's -92. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

06β versus Vital Energy, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning VTLE is approximately 2021% more volatile than MTDR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 95% for Vital Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vital Energy, Inc.

(VTLE) is pulling ahead at 26. 2% versus 5. 1% for Matador Resources Company (MTDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Matador Resources Company grew EPS -14. 7% year-over-year, compared to -114. 2% for Vital Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VTLE leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

8% net margin versus -8. 9% for Vital Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTDR leads at 32. 5% versus -1. 2% for VTLE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTDR leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Vital Energy, Inc.

(VTLE) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 0x for Matador Resources Company — 4. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VTLE: 28. 3% to $23. 00.

In this comparison, MTDR (2.

3% yield) pays a dividend. VTLE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

06), 2. 3% yield, +205. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTDR: +205. 6%, VTLE: -92. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: VTLE is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTDR is a small-cap deep-value stock. MTDR pays a dividend while VTLE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.