Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VZLA vs AG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Silver
VZLA vs AG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Silver |
| Market Cap | $1.18B | $10.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $174M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 29.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $314M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $133M | $792M |
VZLA vs AG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vizsla Silver Corp. (VZLA) | 100 | 179.6 | +79.6% |
| First Majestic Silv… (AG) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VZLA vs AG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VZLA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.34
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, current ratio 34.06x
- Beta 1.34, current ratio 34.06x
AG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 128.2%, EPS growth 202.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.8%
- 128.5% 10Y total return vs VZLA's 40.6%
- 128.2% revenue growth vs VZLA's -245.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 128.2% revenue growth vs VZLA's -245.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.7% margin vs VZLA's 0.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.34 vs AG's 1.56 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +241.7% vs VZLA's +51.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs VZLA's -3.1%, ROIC 13.1% vs -7.2% |
VZLA vs AG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AG and VZLA operate at a comparable scale, with $1.3B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$34M | $636M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | $174M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$45M | $351M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +35.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +29.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +27.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +171.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
VZLA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $10.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -159.19x | 61.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 8.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.06x | 3.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 30.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AG delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-3 for VZLA. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AG scores 7/9 vs VZLA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.1% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.2% | +13.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.2% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$133M | -$478M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $133M | $792M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $314M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 20.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VZLA five years ago would be worth $14,057 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,105 for AG. Over the past 12 months, AG leads with a +241.7% total return vs VZLA's +51.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AG at 46.3% vs VZLA's 32.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.9% | +33.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +51.1% | +241.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +134.9% | +212.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.6% | +31.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.6% | +128.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.9% | +46.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VZLA and AG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VZLA is the less volatile stock with a 1.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AG's 1.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AG currently trades 66.7% from its 52-week high vs VZLA's 47.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 1.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.19 | $32.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.23 | $5.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.7% | +66.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.5M | 16.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VZLA as "Buy" and AG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 104.1% upside for VZLA (target: $7) vs 24.0% for AG (target: $27).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $26.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
AG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VZLA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
VZLA vs AG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VZLA or AG a better buy right now?
First Majestic Silver Corp.
(AG) offers the better valuation at 61. 1x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vizsla Silver Corp. (VZLA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VZLA or AG?
Over the past 5 years, Vizsla Silver Corp.
(VZLA) delivered a total return of +40. 6%, compared to +31. 0% for First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AG returned +128. 5% versus VZLA's +40. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VZLA or AG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vizsla Silver Corp.
(VZLA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 34β versus First Majestic Silver Corp. 's 1. 56β — meaning AG is approximately 17% more volatile than VZLA relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — VZLA or AG?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Majestic Silver Corp.
grew EPS 202. 9% year-over-year, compared to 60. 9% for Vizsla Silver Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VZLA or AG?
First Majestic Silver Corp.
(AG) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus 0. 0% for Vizsla Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AG leads at 27. 8% versus 0. 0% for VZLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AG leads at 34. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is VZLA or AG more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VZLA: 104.
1% to $7. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — VZLA or AG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is VZLA or AG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vizsla Silver Corp.
(VZLA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) carries a higher beta of 1. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VZLA: +40. 6%, AG: +128. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between VZLA and AG?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VZLA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.