WHR vs MHK vs SWK

For growth investors, Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) is the stronger pick with -0. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 5% for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) a "Hold" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) is the cheapest at 7.

9x versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. at 30. 6x. On forward P/E, Whirlpool Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) delivered a total return of -54. 2%, compared to -69. 7% for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SWK returned -0. 7% versus MHK's -47. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

27β versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SWK is approximately 45% more volatile than WHR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 3% for Whirlpool Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) is pulling ahead at -0. 5% versus -6. 5% for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Whirlpool Corporation grew EPS 196. 4% year-over-year, compared to -27. 1% for Mohawk Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MHK leads at -2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus 2. 0% for Whirlpool Corporation — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SWK leads at 7. 6% versus 4. 7% for WHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SWK leads at 29. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) trades at 10.

0x forward P/E versus 17. 8x for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MHK: 19. 3% to $123. 89.

In this comparison, WHR (11.

8% yield), SWK (4. 1% yield) pay a dividend. MHK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

27), 11. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WHR: -43. 4%, MHK: -47. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (WHR (Consumer Cyclical) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical) and SWK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WHR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. WHR, SWK pay a dividend while MHK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.