Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WLDN vs TTEK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
WLDN vs TTEK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $8.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $682M | $4.91B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $53M | $440M |
| Gross Margin | 37.5% | 19.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | 18.6x | 20.7x |
| Total Debt | $69M | $987M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $167M |
WLDN vs TTEK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) | 100 | 313.5 | +213.5% |
| Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) | 100 | 200.6 | +100.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WLDN vs TTEK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WLDN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 120.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.7%
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs TTEK's 465.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.96, Low D/E 22.7%, current ratio 1.56x
TTEK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 0.8%
- Beta 0.53, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.18x
- 9.0% margin vs WLDN's 7.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs TTEK's 4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.6x vs 20.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.0% margin vs WLDN's 7.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs WLDN's 1.96 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +93.5% vs TTEK's +4.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.5% ROA vs TTEK's 10.2%, ROIC 11.5% vs 17.4% |
WLDN vs TTEK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WLDN vs TTEK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTEK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTEK is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.9B annually — 7.2x WLDN's $682M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.0% (TTEK) to 7.7% (WLDN). On growth, WLDN holds the edge at +20.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $682M | $4.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $63M | $666M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $53M | $440M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $71M | $669M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +19.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.6% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +132.1% | +16.8% |
Valuation Metrics
WLDN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.0x trailing earnings, WLDN trades at a 35% valuation discount to TTEK's 34.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TTEK's 13.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WLDN's 18.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $8.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $9.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.96x | 34.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.59x | 20.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.10x | 13.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.66x | 1.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.79x | 4.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.04x | 18.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — WLDN and TTEK each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TTEK delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $19 for WLDN. WLDN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTEK's 0.55x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.1% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.5% | +10.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.5% | +17.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.4% | +20.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $820M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $167M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $69M | $987M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.96x | 19.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WLDN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WLDN five years ago would be worth $20,778 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,188 for TTEK. Over the past 12 months, WLDN leads with a +93.5% total return vs TTEK's +4.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WLDN at 69.0% vs TTEK's 4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.1% | -5.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +93.5% | +4.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +382.4% | +12.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.8% | +31.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +609.1% | +465.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +69.0% | +4.0% |
Risk & Volatility
TTEK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTEK is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WLDN's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TTEK currently trades 73.4% from its 52-week high vs WLDN's 55.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.96x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $137.00 | $43.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.07 | $29.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.9% | +73.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.5 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 340K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
TTEK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WLDN as "Buy" and TTEK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.3% upside for WLDN (target: $118) vs 31.1% for TTEK (target: $42). TTEK is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $117.50 | $41.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% |
TTEK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). WLDN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
WLDN vs TTEK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WLDN or TTEK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK). Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) offers the better valuation at 22. 0x trailing P/E (18. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WLDN or TTEK?
On trailing P/E, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the cheapest at 22. 0x versus Tetra Tech, Inc. at 34. 0x. On forward P/E, Willdan Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WLDN or TTEK?
Over the past 5 years, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) delivered a total return of +107. 8%, compared to +31. 9% for Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WLDN returned +609. 1% versus TTEK's +465. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WLDN or TTEK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Willdan Group, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning WLDN is approximately 266% more volatile than TTEK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 55% for Tetra Tech, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WLDN or TTEK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus 4. 7% for Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Willdan Group, Inc. grew EPS 120. 9% year-over-year, compared to -24. 4% for Tetra Tech, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTEK leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WLDN or TTEK?
Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 7% net margin versus 4. 6% for Tetra Tech, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTEK leads at 11. 1% versus 6. 5% for WLDN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WLDN leads at 37. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WLDN or TTEK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) trades at 18. 6x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for Tetra Tech, Inc. — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WLDN: 53. 3% to $117. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WLDN or TTEK?
In this comparison, TTEK (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. WLDN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WLDN or TTEK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 0. 8% yield, +465. 6% 10Y return). Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTEK: +465. 6%, WLDN: +609. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WLDN and TTEK?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WLDN is a small-cap high-growth stock; TTEK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TTEK pays a dividend while WLDN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.